Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSIKX vs CUBCX
BSIKX vs CUBCX Comparison
Open Charts BSIKX vs CUBCX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opps K
Price$9.82
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.11B
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund
Price$15.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets693.2M
BSIKX vs CUBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSIKX vs. CUBCX commentary
Sep 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSIKX is a Hold and CUBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSIKX has more cash in the bank: 44.1B vs. CUBCX (693M). BSIKX pays higher dividends than CUBCX: BSIKX (4.71) vs CUBCX (4.07). BSIKX was incepted earlier than CUBCX: BSIKX (9 years) vs CUBCX (11 years). CUBCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than BSIKX (0.62). BSIKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1117.00 vs. CUBCX (450.00). CUBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BSIKX: CUBCX (1000) vs BSIKX (5000000). BSIKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.65 vs. CUBCX (5.06). CUBCX return over 5 years is better than : 19.32 vs. BSIKX (17.80).
| BSIKX | CUBCX | BSIKX / CUBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.65 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.69 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.937 | 5.834 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.1B | 693M | 6,364% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.71 | 4.07 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.65 | 5.06 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.16 | 19.02 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.80 | 19.32 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 31.26 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers