Ad is loading...
BSIKX vs CUBCX
BSIKX vs CUBCX Comparison
Open Charts BSIKX vs CUBCX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opps K
Price$9.55
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.13B
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund
Price$14.71
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets632.13M
BSIKX vs CUBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSIKX vs. CUBCX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSIKX is a Hold and CUBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSIKX has more cash in the bank: 41.1B vs. CUBCX (632M). BSIKX pays higher dividends than CUBCX: BSIKX (4.91) vs CUBCX (4.34). BSIKX was incepted earlier than CUBCX: BSIKX (9 years) vs CUBCX (11 years). CUBCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than BSIKX (0.66). BSIKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1117.00 vs. CUBCX (450.00). CUBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BSIKX: CUBCX (1000) vs BSIKX (5000000). BSIKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.24 vs. CUBCX (7.10). CUBCX return over 5 years is better than : 22.42 vs. BSIKX (19.96).
| BSIKX | CUBCX | BSIKX / CUBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.67 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.68 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.976 | 1.770 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.1B | 632M | 6,503% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.91 | 4.34 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.24 | 7.10 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.74 | 12.54 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.96 | 22.42 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 25.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers