Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSIKX vs CUBCX
BSIKX vs CUBCX Comparison
Open Charts BSIKX vs CUBCX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opps K
Price$9.55
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.38B
Calvert Flexible Bond Fund
Price$14.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets631.46M
BSIKX vs CUBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSIKX vs. CUBCX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSIKX is a Hold and CUBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSIKX has more cash in the bank: 41.4B vs. CUBCX (631M). BSIKX pays higher dividends than CUBCX: BSIKX (4.87) vs CUBCX (4.29). BSIKX was incepted earlier than CUBCX: BSIKX (9 years) vs CUBCX (11 years). CUBCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than BSIKX (0.62). BSIKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1117.00 vs. CUBCX (450.00). CUBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BSIKX: CUBCX (1000) vs BSIKX (5000000). BSIKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.50 vs. CUBCX (6.00). CUBCX return over 5 years is better than : 21.71 vs. BSIKX (18.79).
| BSIKX | CUBCX | BSIKX / CUBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.65 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 1.69 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.358 | 1.831 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.4B | 631M | 6,561% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.87 | 4.29 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.50 | 6.00 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.20 | 13.69 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.79 | 21.71 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 25.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers