Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSIKX vs NTBCX
BSIKX vs NTBCX Comparison
Open Charts BSIKX vs NTBCX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opps K
Price$9.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.35B
Navigator Tactical Fixed Income C
Price$9.65
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.46B
BSIKX vs NTBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSIKX vs. NTBCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSIKX is a Hold and NTBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSIKX has more cash in the bank: 44.3B vs. NTBCX (7.46B). BSIKX (4.65) and NTBCX (4.64) have matching dividends . BSIKX was incepted earlier than NTBCX: BSIKX (10 years) vs NTBCX (12 years). NTBCX (2.09) is less costly to investors than BSIKX (0.62). BSIKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 1117.00 vs. NTBCX (34.00). NTBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BSIKX: NTBCX (5000) vs BSIKX (5000000). BSIKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.74 vs. NTBCX (0.84). BSIKX return over 5 years is better than : 15.74 vs. NTBCX (2.59).
| BSIKX | NTBCX | BSIKX / NTBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.07 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.09 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.099 | 0.768 | 924% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 5000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 44.3B | 7.46B | 594% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.65 | 4.64 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.74 | 0.84 | 925% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.50 | 17.77 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.74 | 2.59 | 609% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 32.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers