BSM
Price
$13.38
Change
+$0.11 (+0.83%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.81B
38 days until earnings call
PTHRF
Price
$0.33
Change
-$0.01 (-2.94%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
453.03M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BSM vs PTHRF

Header iconBSM vs PTHRF Comparison
Open Charts BSM vs PTHRFBanner chart's image
Black Stone Minerals
Price$13.38
Change+$0.11 (+0.83%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.81B
Pantheon Resources
Price$0.33
Change-$0.01 (-2.94%)
Volume$402.5K
Capitalization453.03M
BSM vs PTHRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PTHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSM vs. PTHRF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSM is a Buy and PTHRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BSM: $13.27 vs. PTHRF: $0.33)
Brand notoriety: BSM and PTHRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSM: 73% vs. PTHRF: 111%
Market capitalization -- BSM: $2.81B vs. PTHRF: $453.03M
BSM [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $2.81B. PTHRF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $453.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $120.91B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSM’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePTHRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BSM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PTHRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BSM is a better buy in the long-term than PTHRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PTHRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PTHRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BSM is a better buy in the short-term than PTHRF.

Price Growth

BSM (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +2.39% price change this week, while PTHRF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -5.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +4.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

BSM is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+4.10% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSM($2.81B) has a higher market cap than PTHRF($453M). BSM YTD gains are higher at: -1.848 vs. PTHRF (-12.200).
BSMPTHRFBSM / PTHRF
Capitalization2.81B453M621%
EBITDA321MN/A-
Gain YTD-1.848-12.20015%
P/E Ratio11.44N/A-
Revenue429MN/A-
Total Cash2.52MN/A-
Total Debt99MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSM vs PTHRF: Fundamental Ratings
BSM
PTHRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
751
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1695
SMR RATING
1..100
4294
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5464
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
306
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BSM's Valuation (7) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is significantly better than the same rating for PTHRF (83) in the null industry. This means that BSM’s stock grew significantly faster than PTHRF’s over the last 12 months.

BSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is significantly better than the same rating for PTHRF (95) in the null industry. This means that BSM’s stock grew significantly faster than PTHRF’s over the last 12 months.

BSM's SMR Rating (42) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PTHRF (94) in the null industry. This means that BSM’s stock grew somewhat faster than PTHRF’s over the last 12 months.

BSM's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as PTHRF (64) in the null industry. This means that BSM’s stock grew similarly to PTHRF’s over the last 12 months.

PTHRF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as BSM (30) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that PTHRF’s stock grew similarly to BSM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSMPTHRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PTHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NSBCX66.63N/A
N/A
Nuveen Dividend Growth C
GLCTX34.27N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts Inv
NSNRX53.02N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth R3
FIVVX37.62N/A
N/A
Macquarie Opportunity R6
NELIX66.28N/A
N/A
Nuveen Equity Long/Short I

BSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSM has been closely correlated with FANG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BSM jumps, then FANG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSM
1D Price
Change %
BSM100%
-0.30%
FANG - BSM
71%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
DVN - BSM
68%
Closely correlated
+1.56%
CHRD - BSM
68%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
PR - BSM
68%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
OVV - BSM
68%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
More

PTHRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PTHRF and AAVVF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PTHRF and AAVVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PTHRF
1D Price
Change %
PTHRF100%
-3.73%
AAVVF - PTHRF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
CNQ - PTHRF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.95%
WDS - PTHRF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
TRMLF - PTHRF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
BSM - PTHRF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
More