BSND
Price
$805.00
Change
-$19.00 (-2.31%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
CXMSF
Price
$0.54
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
11.5B
Ad is loading...

BSND vs CXMSF

Header iconBSND vs CXMSF Comparison
Open Charts BSND vs CXMSFBanner chart's image
Boston Sand & Gravel
Price$805.00
Change-$19.00 (-2.31%)
Volume$21
CapitalizationN/A
Cemex S.A.B de C.V
Price$0.54
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$990
Capitalization11.5B
BSND vs CXMSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BSND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CXMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSND vs. CXMSF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSND is a Hold and CXMSF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BSND: $805.00 vs. CXMSF: $0.54)
Brand notoriety: BSND and CXMSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSND: 67% vs. CXMSF: 0%
Market capitalization -- BSND: $0 vs. CXMSF: $11.5B
BSND [@Construction Materials] is valued at $0. CXMSF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $11.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSND’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCXMSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BSND’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CXMSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BSND is a better buy in the long-term than CXMSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSND’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CXMSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSND’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CXMSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BSND is a better buy in the short-term than CXMSF.

Price Growth

BSND (@Construction Materials) experienced а -2.31% price change this week, while CXMSF (@Construction Materials) price change was -0.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.70%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+1.68% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSND YTD gains are higher at: -0.617 vs. CXMSF (-5.155).
BSNDCXMSFBSND / CXMSF
CapitalizationN/A11.5B-
EBITDAN/A1.69B-
Gain YTD-0.617-5.15512%
P/E RatioN/A4.88-
RevenueN/A16.4B-
Total CashN/A471M-
Total DebtN/A9.16B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSND vs CXMSF: Fundamental Ratings
BSND
CXMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10069
SMR RATING
1..100
10085
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5479
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10097
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BSND's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as CXMSF (16). This means that BSND’s stock grew similarly to CXMSF’s over the last 12 months.

CXMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as BSND (100). This means that CXMSF’s stock grew similarly to BSND’s over the last 12 months.

CXMSF's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as BSND (100). This means that CXMSF’s stock grew similarly to BSND’s over the last 12 months.

BSND's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as CXMSF (79). This means that BSND’s stock grew similarly to CXMSF’s over the last 12 months.

CXMSF's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as BSND (100). This means that CXMSF’s stock grew similarly to BSND’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSNDCXMSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
25%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BSND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CXMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PMPIX51.550.58
+1.14%
ProFunds Precious Metals UltraSector Inv
FIFNX24.110.27
+1.13%
Fidelity Advisor Founders
IIRSX14.450.06
+0.42%
Voya Russell Small Cap Index Port I
HCMPX17.870.06
+0.34%
HCM Dividend Sector Plus Investor
BGRUX96.570.10
+0.10%
Baron Growth R6

BSND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BSND and XYIGF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BSND and XYIGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSND
1D Price
Change %
BSND100%
N/A
XYIGF - BSND
6%
Poorly correlated
+3.39%
WBRBY - BSND
4%
Poorly correlated
+6.17%
CXMSF - BSND
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBRBF - BSND
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THYCY - BSND
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CXMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CXMSF and CX have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CXMSF and CX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXMSF
1D Price
Change %
CXMSF100%
N/A
CX - CXMSF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.65%
WBRBY - CXMSF
17%
Poorly correlated
+6.17%
XYIGY - CXMSF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
SDCVF - CXMSF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRKWF - CXMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More