Advertisement
BSRTF vs KMMPF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSRTF is a Hold and KMMPF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BSRTF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKMMPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BSRTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- KMMPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BSRTF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMMPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BSRTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- KMMPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
BSRTF (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а -0.80% price change this week, while KMMPF (@Media Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -2.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.64%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Media Conglomerates (-2.56% weekly)Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
| BSRTF | KMMPF | BSRTF / KMMPF | |
| Capitalization | 420M | 1.52B | 28% |
| EBITDA | -22.18M | 331M | -7% |
| Gain YTD | 5.336 | 8.812 | 61% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 3.82 | - |
| Revenue | 162M | 375M | 43% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 10.8M | - |
| Total Debt | 660M | 2.21B | 30% |
BSRTF | KMMPF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 89 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 47 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BSRTF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as KMMPF (29). This means that BSRTF’s stock grew similarly to KMMPF’s over the last 12 months.
BSRTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as KMMPF (100). This means that BSRTF’s stock grew similarly to KMMPF’s over the last 12 months.
KMMPF's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BSRTF (94). This means that KMMPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BSRTF’s over the last 12 months.
BSRTF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as KMMPF (62). This means that BSRTF’s stock grew similarly to KMMPF’s over the last 12 months.
BSRTF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KMMPF (94). This means that BSRTF’s stock grew significantly faster than KMMPF’s over the last 12 months.
| BSRTF | KMMPF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 32% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 41% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 36% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 28% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 42% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 40% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 62% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 62% | 14 days ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | 1 day ago 29% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 40% |
Advertisement
KMMPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that KMMPF and CPT have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KMMPF and CPT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KMMPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMMPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CPT - KMMPF | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.40% | ||
| BSRTF - KMMPF | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.06% | ||
| FR - KMMPF | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.17% | ||
| BYLOF - KMMPF | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.37% | ||
| KLPEF - KMMPF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||