BSVN
Price
$44.00
Change
+$0.50 (+1.15%)
Updated
Jan 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
258.16M
83 days until earnings call
EFSC
Price
$60.12
Change
+$0.18 (+0.30%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.47B
87 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BSVN vs EFSC

Header iconBSVN vs EFSC Comparison
Open Charts BSVN vs EFSCBanner chart's image
Bank7
Price$44.00
Change+$0.50 (+1.15%)
Volume$238
Capitalization258.16M
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$60.12
Change+$0.18 (+0.30%)
Volume$161.47K
Capitalization1.47B
BSVN vs EFSC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BSVN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSVN vs. EFSC commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSVN is a Buy and EFSC is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (BSVN: $43.58 vs. EFSC: $60.12)
Brand notoriety: BSVN and EFSC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSVN: 59% vs. EFSC: 107%
Market capitalization -- BSVN: $258.16M vs. EFSC: $1.47B
BSVN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $258.16M. EFSC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSVN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEFSC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BSVN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • EFSC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the long-term than BSVN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSVN’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EFSC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSVN’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • EFSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the short-term than BSVN.

Price Growth

BSVN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.66% price change this week, while EFSC (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

BSVN is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFSC($1.47B) has a higher market cap than BSVN($258M). BSVN has higher P/E ratio than EFSC: BSVN (9.16) vs EFSC (7.73). EFSC YTD gains are higher at: 6.596 vs. BSVN (-6.601). EFSC has more cash in the bank: 193M vs. BSVN (169M). BSVN has less debt than EFSC: BSVN (4.8M) vs EFSC (204M). EFSC has higher revenues than BSVN: EFSC (550M) vs BSVN (91.8M).
BSVNEFSCBSVN / EFSC
Capitalization258M1.47B18%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.6016.596-100%
P/E Ratio9.167.73119%
Revenue91.8M550M17%
Total Cash169M193M88%
Total Debt4.8M204M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSVN vs EFSC: Fundamental Ratings
BSVN
EFSC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
310
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1041
SMR RATING
1..100
2612
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4642
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5717
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4033

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EFSC's Valuation (75) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BSVN (88). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to BSVN’s over the last 12 months.

BSVN's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (41). This means that BSVN’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BSVN (26). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to BSVN’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BSVN (46). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to BSVN’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BSVN (57). This means that EFSC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BSVN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSVNEFSC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BSVN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NAMAX14.250.12
+0.85%
Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Instl
RYMPX36.57N/A
N/A
Rydex Precious Metals H
TSFYX15.77N/A
N/A
Touchstone Small Cap Y
HDGFX34.29N/A
N/A
Hartford Dividend and Growth F
UGTCX27.94N/A
N/A
Victory Growth and Tax Strategy C

BSVN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSVN has been loosely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BSVN jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSVN
1D Price
Change %
BSVN100%
+0.18%
EFSC - BSVN
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
MCBS - BSVN
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
FFBC - BSVN
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
NWBI - BSVN
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
FBMS - BSVN
58%
Loosely correlated
+3.23%
More