BSVN
Price
$40.12
Change
-$1.69 (-4.04%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
258.16M
59 days until earnings call
ORPB
Price
$8.33
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
51.44M
Ad is loading...

BSVN vs ORPB

Header iconBSVN vs ORPB Comparison
Open Charts BSVN vs ORPBBanner chart's image
Bank7
Price$40.12
Change-$1.69 (-4.04%)
Volume$30.14K
Capitalization258.16M
Oregon Pacific Ban
Price$8.33
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization51.44M
BSVN vs ORPB Comparison Chart
Loading...
BSVN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSVN vs. ORPB commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSVN is a Hold and ORPB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (BSVN: $40.12 vs. ORPB: $8.33)
Brand notoriety: BSVN and ORPB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSVN: 118% vs. ORPB: 58%
Market capitalization -- BSVN: $258.16M vs. ORPB: $51.44M
BSVN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $258.16M. ORPB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $51.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSVN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileORPB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BSVN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ORPB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ORPB is a better buy in the long-term than BSVN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSVN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BSVN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BSVN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -7.07% price change this week, while ORPB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

BSVN is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

ORPB is expected to report earnings on Apr 18, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSVN($258M) has a higher market cap than ORPB($51.4M). ORPB has higher P/E ratio than BSVN: ORPB (16.53) vs BSVN (9.16). ORPB YTD gains are higher at: 4.125 vs. BSVN (-14.016). BSVN has higher revenues than ORPB: BSVN (91.8M) vs ORPB (16.6M).
BSVNORPBBSVN / ORPB
Capitalization258M51.4M502%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-14.0164.125-340%
P/E Ratio9.1616.5355%
Revenue91.8M16.6M553%
Total Cash169MN/A-
Total Debt4.8MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSVN vs ORPB: Fundamental Ratings
BSVN
ORPB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1244
SMR RATING
1..100
275
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6112
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ORPB's Valuation (81) in the null industry is in the same range as BSVN (86) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ORPB’s stock grew similarly to BSVN’s over the last 12 months.

BSVN's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as ORPB (44) in the null industry. This means that BSVN’s stock grew similarly to ORPB’s over the last 12 months.

ORPB's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as BSVN (27) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ORPB’s stock grew similarly to BSVN’s over the last 12 months.

ORPB's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as BSVN (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ORPB’s stock grew similarly to BSVN’s over the last 12 months.

ORPB's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BSVN (61) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that ORPB’s stock grew somewhat faster than BSVN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSVN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BSVN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CQQQ49.451.42
+2.96%
Invesco China Technology ETF
RSPS30.520.50
+1.67%
Invesco S&P 500® Eql Wt Cnsm Stapl ETF
FLJH30.60-0.35
-1.13%
Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
SLV29.59-0.36
-1.20%
iShares Silver Trust
MEXX11.95-0.63
-5.01%
Direxion Dly MSCI Mexico Bull 3X ShsETF

BSVN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSVN has been loosely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BSVN jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSVN
1D Price
Change %
BSVN100%
-4.04%
EFSC - BSVN
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.24%
MCBS - BSVN
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.89%
TMP - BSVN
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.58%
NWBI - BSVN
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.63%
CCNE - BSVN
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.83%
More

ORPB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ORPB and MVLY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ORPB and MVLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ORPB
1D Price
Change %
ORPB100%
N/A
MVLY - ORPB
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSVN - ORPB
27%
Poorly correlated
-4.04%
TBNK - ORPB
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.59%
PCB - ORPB
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.14%
NFBK - ORPB
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
More