Advertisement
BSX vs PCHM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSX is a Hold and PCHM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BSX’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePCHM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BSX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PCHM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BSX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PCHM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BSX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PCHM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
BSX (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -5.86% price change this week, while PCHM (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +2.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
BSX is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (+2.93% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| BSX | PCHM | BSX / PCHM | |
| Capitalization | 146B | 17.3M | 843,931% |
| EBITDA | 4.65B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.975 | 22.549 | 44% |
| P/E Ratio | 58.47 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 18.5B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 534M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 12B | N/A | - |
BSX | PCHM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 74 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 64 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 10 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PCHM's Valuation (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BSX (81) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that PCHM’s stock grew significantly faster than BSX’s over the last 12 months.
BSX's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for PCHM (74) in the null industry. This means that BSX’s stock grew significantly faster than PCHM’s over the last 12 months.
BSX's SMR Rating (64) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as PCHM (95) in the null industry. This means that BSX’s stock grew similarly to PCHM’s over the last 12 months.
PCHM's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as BSX (59) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that PCHM’s stock grew similarly to BSX’s over the last 12 months.
BSX's P/E Growth Rating (64) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PCHM (100) in the null industry. This means that BSX’s stock grew somewhat faster than PCHM’s over the last 12 months.
| BSX | PCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 62% | 23 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 74% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MINT | 100.54 | 0.03 | +0.03% |
| PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | |||
| SIFI | 44.15 | N/A | N/A |
| Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF | |||
| OCTP | 29.49 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Oct | |||
| BSCX | 21.62 | -0.02 | -0.09% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2033 Corp Bd ETF | |||
| HERO | 34.33 | -0.13 | -0.38% |
| Global X Video Games & Esports ETF | |||
BSX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSX has been closely correlated with ISRG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BSX jumps, then ISRG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BSX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSX | 100% | -0.27% | ||
| ISRG - BSX | 71% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| SYK - BSX | 67% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| MMSI - BSX | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| ALC - BSX | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| EW - BSX | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||
PCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PCHM and INSP have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCHM and INSP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCHM | 100% | N/A | ||
| INSP - PCHM | 24% Poorly correlated | +4.25% | ||
| TNON - PCHM | 22% Poorly correlated | +4.32% | ||
| OTCFF - PCHM | 20% Poorly correlated | +29.97% | ||
| BSX - PCHM | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| EW - PCHM | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.86% | ||
More | ||||