BTCS
Price
$5.00
Change
+$0.50 (+11.11%)
Updated
Aug 8, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
239.26M
CNSRF
Price
$10.77
Change
-$0.89 (-7.63%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
751.08M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTCS vs CNSRF

Header iconBTCS vs CNSRF Comparison
Open Charts BTCS vs CNSRFBanner chart's image
BTCS
Price$5.00
Change+$0.50 (+11.11%)
Volume$72.4K
Capitalization239.26M
Coinshares International
Price$10.77
Change-$0.89 (-7.63%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization751.08M
BTCS vs CNSRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTCS vs. CNSRF commentary
Aug 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTCS is a Hold and CNSRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 09, 2025
Stock price -- (BTCS: $4.50 vs. CNSRF: $10.77)
Brand notoriety: BTCS and CNSRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTCS: 57% vs. CNSRF: 69%
Market capitalization -- BTCS: $27.77M vs. CNSRF: $301.13M
BTCS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $27.77M. CNSRF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $301.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTCS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCNSRF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BTCS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CNSRF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNSRF is a better buy in the long-term than BTCS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTCS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNSRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTCS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CNSRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNSRF is a better buy in the short-term than BTCS.

Price Growth

BTCS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.53% price change this week, while CNSRF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -9.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +15.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+15.60% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNSRF($751M) has a higher market cap than BTCS($239M). CNSRF has higher P/E ratio than BTCS: CNSRF (32.94) vs BTCS (5.83). BTCS YTD gains are higher at: 82.186 vs. CNSRF (41.758). CNSRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 127M vs. BTCS (-8.88M). CNSRF has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. BTCS (20.4M). BTCS has less debt than CNSRF: BTCS (849K) vs CNSRF (50.4M). CNSRF has higher revenues than BTCS: CNSRF (115M) vs BTCS (5.31M).
BTCSCNSRFBTCS / CNSRF
Capitalization239M751M32%
EBITDA-8.88M127M-7%
Gain YTD82.18641.758197%
P/E Ratio5.8332.9418%
Revenue5.31M115M5%
Total Cash20.4M1.11B2%
Total Debt849K50.4M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTCS: Fundamental Ratings
BTCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
82
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTCSCNSRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CNSRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HAGIX82.62N/A
N/A
Carillon Eagle Mid Cap Growth I
GMLGX34.74N/A
N/A
GuideMark® Large Cap Core Service
CPCRX4.51N/A
N/A
Comstock Capital Value I
FOPAX23.35N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Intl Sm Cap Opps A
WLCVX22.14N/A
N/A
Wilshire Large Company Value Instl

BTCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTCS has been loosely correlated with DMGGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BTCS jumps, then DMGGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTCS
1D Price
Change %
BTCS100%
+7.14%
DMGGF - BTCS
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.55%
HUT - BTCS
51%
Loosely correlated
-3.24%
BITF - BTCS
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.18%
MARA - BTCS
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
ABTS - BTCS
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.66%
More

CNSRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CNSRF and AVFCF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CNSRF and AVFCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNSRF
1D Price
Change %
CNSRF100%
N/A
AVFCF - CNSRF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNPFF - CNSRF
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.56%
GREE - CNSRF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
BTCS - CNSRF
7%
Poorly correlated
+7.14%
ERNXY - CNSRF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More