BTCS
Price
$4.35
Change
+$0.09 (+2.11%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
209.03M
70 days until earnings call
HAFG
Price
$0.68
Change
+$0.05 (+7.94%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
47.88M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTCS vs HAFG

Header iconBTCS vs HAFG Comparison
Open Charts BTCS vs HAFGBanner chart's image
BTCS
Price$4.35
Change+$0.09 (+2.11%)
Volume$1.99M
Capitalization209.03M
Holistic Asset Finance Group
Price$0.68
Change+$0.05 (+7.94%)
Volume$750
Capitalization47.88M
BTCS vs HAFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HAFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTCS vs. HAFG commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTCS is a Buy and HAFG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BTCS: $4.35 vs. HAFG: $0.68)
Brand notoriety: BTCS and HAFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTCS: 18% vs. HAFG: 78%
Market capitalization -- BTCS: $209.03M vs. HAFG: $47.88M
BTCS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $209.03M. HAFG’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $47.88M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTCS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHAFG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTCS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HAFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTCS is a better buy in the long-term than HAFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTCS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTCS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HAFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HAFG is a better buy in the short-term than BTCS.

Price Growth

BTCS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.93% price change this week, while HAFG (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

BTCS is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.94% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTCS($209M) has a higher market cap than HAFG($47.9M). BTCS YTD gains are higher at: 76.113 vs. HAFG (-9.976). BTCS has more cash in the bank: 40.1M vs. HAFG (6.79K).
BTCSHAFGBTCS / HAFG
Capitalization209M47.9M436%
EBITDA-26.85MN/A-
Gain YTD76.113-9.976-763%
P/E Ratio5.83N/A-
Revenue7.52MN/A-
Total Cash40.1M6.79K590,400%
Total Debt8.8MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTCS vs HAFG: Fundamental Ratings
BTCS
HAFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6236
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
93100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3665
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTCS's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as HAFG (34). This means that BTCS’s stock grew similarly to HAFG’s over the last 12 months.

BTCS's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as HAFG (100). This means that BTCS’s stock grew similarly to HAFG’s over the last 12 months.

BTCS's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HAFG (100). This means that BTCS’s stock grew similarly to HAFG’s over the last 12 months.

BTCS's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as HAFG (65). This means that BTCS’s stock grew similarly to HAFG’s over the last 12 months.

BTCS's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HAFG (100). This means that BTCS’s stock grew similarly to HAFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTCSHAFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
81%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HAFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WYGPF8.96N/A
N/A
Worley Ltd.
BTUMF0.03N/A
N/A
BTU METALS CORP.
LKSGF0.01N/A
N/A
Luks Group Vietnam Holdings Co., Ltd.
CSWYF1.00N/A
N/A
China Shineway Pharmaceutical Group Ltd.
GASNY6.27-0.06
-0.92%
Naturgy Energy Group SA

BTCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTCS has been loosely correlated with DMGGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BTCS jumps, then DMGGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTCS
1D Price
Change %
BTCS100%
+2.11%
DMGGF - BTCS
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.54%
MARA - BTCS
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
ABTS - BTCS
37%
Loosely correlated
-3.16%
BTBT - BTCS
36%
Loosely correlated
-4.74%
BBKCF - BTCS
36%
Loosely correlated
+10.11%
More

HAFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HAFG and CIIHF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HAFG and CIIHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAFG
1D Price
Change %
HAFG100%
N/A
CIIHF - HAFG
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TVAVF - HAFG
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
GREE - HAFG
13%
Poorly correlated
-4.58%
BTCS - HAFG
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
PROP - HAFG
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.01%
More