BTCS
Price
$4.45
Change
-$0.05 (-1.11%)
Updated
Aug 8, 12:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
27.77M
PNPFF
Price
$11.08
Change
-$0.18 (-1.60%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
27.26M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTCS vs PNPFF

Header iconBTCS vs PNPFF Comparison
Open Charts BTCS vs PNPFFBanner chart's image
BTCS
Price$4.45
Change-$0.05 (-1.11%)
Volume$1.08K
Capitalization27.77M
Pinetree Capital
Price$11.08
Change-$0.18 (-1.60%)
Volume$425
Capitalization27.26M
BTCS vs PNPFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTCS vs. PNPFF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTCS is a Hold and PNPFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BTCS: $4.50 vs. PNPFF: $11.08)
Brand notoriety: BTCS and PNPFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTCS: 57% vs. PNPFF: 36%
Market capitalization -- BTCS: $27.77M vs. PNPFF: $27.26M
BTCS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $27.77M. PNPFF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $27.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTCS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePNPFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BTCS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PNPFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PNPFF is a better buy in the long-term than BTCS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTCS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNPFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTCS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PNPFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTCS is a better buy in the short-term than PNPFF.

Price Growth

BTCS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -1.53% price change this week, while PNPFF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -5.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +14.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+14.94% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTCS($27.8M) and PNPFF($27.3M) have the same market capitalization . PNPFF has higher P/E ratio than BTCS: PNPFF (11.10) vs BTCS (3.22). BTCS YTD gains are higher at: 82.186 vs. PNPFF (45.026). BTCS has less debt than PNPFF: BTCS (1.27M) vs PNPFF (6.69M). PNPFF has higher revenues than BTCS: PNPFF (4.23M) vs BTCS (1.34M).
BTCSPNPFFBTCS / PNPFF
Capitalization27.8M27.3M102%
EBITDA-3.71MN/A-
Gain YTD82.18645.026183%
P/E Ratio3.2211.1029%
Revenue1.34M4.23M32%
Total Cash26.7MN/A-
Total Debt1.27M6.69M19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTCS vs PNPFF: Fundamental Ratings
BTCS
PNPFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8286
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9024
SMR RATING
1..100
9921
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1052
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTCS's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNPFF (68). This means that BTCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNPFF’s over the last 12 months.

PNPFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTCS (90). This means that PNPFF’s stock grew significantly faster than BTCS’s over the last 12 months.

PNPFF's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTCS (99). This means that PNPFF’s stock grew significantly faster than BTCS’s over the last 12 months.

BTCS's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PNPFF (43). This means that BTCS’s stock grew similarly to PNPFF’s over the last 12 months.

BTCS's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNPFF (52). This means that BTCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNPFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTCSPNPFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UAMY3.520.12
+3.53%
United States Antimony Corp
VMI368.01-0.26
-0.07%
Valmont Industries
AZO4060.33-12.47
-0.31%
AutoZone
MASS6.41-0.12
-1.91%
908 Devices
ATRO30.01-5.36
-15.15%
Astronics Corp

PNPFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PNPFF and BTCS have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PNPFF and BTCS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNPFF
1D Price
Change %
PNPFF100%
-1.56%
BTCS - PNPFF
15%
Poorly correlated
+7.14%
ERNXY - PNPFF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNSRF - PNPFF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COIN - PNPFF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.37%
HOOD - PNPFF
7%
Poorly correlated
+5.28%
More