BTCS
Price
$4.92
Change
+$0.13 (+2.72%)
Updated
Sep 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
232.09M
50 days until earnings call
PNPFF
Price
$9.47
Change
+$0.12 (+1.28%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
87.36M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTCS vs PNPFF

Header iconBTCS vs PNPFF Comparison
Open Charts BTCS vs PNPFFBanner chart's image
BTCS
Price$4.92
Change+$0.13 (+2.72%)
Volume$15.9K
Capitalization232.09M
Pinetree Capital
Price$9.47
Change+$0.12 (+1.28%)
Volume$370
Capitalization87.36M
BTCS vs PNPFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTCS vs. PNPFF commentary
Sep 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTCS is a Hold and PNPFF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BTCS: $4.78 vs. PNPFF: $9.47)
Brand notoriety: BTCS and PNPFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTCS: 25% vs. PNPFF: 11%
Market capitalization -- BTCS: $232.09M vs. PNPFF: $87.36M
BTCS [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $232.09M. PNPFF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $87.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTCS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePNPFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BTCS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PNPFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTCS is a better buy in the long-term than PNPFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTCS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNPFF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTCS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PNPFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PNPFF is a better buy in the short-term than BTCS.

Price Growth

BTCS (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +14.08% price change this week, while PNPFF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +4.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +4.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +62.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

BTCS is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+4.16% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTCS($232M) has a higher market cap than PNPFF($87.4M). BTCS has higher P/E ratio than PNPFF: BTCS (5.83) vs PNPFF (3.93). BTCS YTD gains are higher at: 93.522 vs. PNPFF (23.953). PNPFF has higher revenues than BTCS: PNPFF (33M) vs BTCS (7.52M).
BTCSPNPFFBTCS / PNPFF
Capitalization232M87.4M265%
EBITDA-26.85MN/A-
Gain YTD93.52223.953390%
P/E Ratio5.833.93148%
Revenue7.52M33M23%
Total Cash40.1MN/A-
Total Debt8.8MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTCS vs PNPFF: Fundamental Ratings
BTCS
PNPFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6119
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9143
SMR RATING
1..100
9821
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3558
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
974
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTCS's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNPFF (71). This means that BTCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNPFF’s over the last 12 months.

PNPFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTCS (91). This means that PNPFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTCS’s over the last 12 months.

PNPFF's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTCS (98). This means that PNPFF’s stock grew significantly faster than BTCS’s over the last 12 months.

BTCS's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PNPFF (58). This means that BTCS’s stock grew similarly to PNPFF’s over the last 12 months.

BTCS's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNPFF (74). This means that BTCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNPFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTCSPNPFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNPFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHLSY15.710.35
+2.28%
CHOCOLADEFABRIKEN LINDT & SPRUENGLI AG
RGEDF29.25N/A
N/A
Gedeon Richter Ltd
KKPCF28.09N/A
N/A
Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
VTEPF0.63N/A
N/A
VIDENDUM PLC
ENTEF0.06N/A
-3.33%
ESE Entertainment Inc.

BTCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTCS has been loosely correlated with DMGGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BTCS jumps, then DMGGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTCS
1D Price
Change %
BTCS100%
-1.04%
DMGGF - BTCS
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.65%
MARA - BTCS
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
ABTS - BTCS
38%
Loosely correlated
-6.49%
BBKCF - BTCS
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
BTBT - BTCS
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
More

PNPFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PNPFF and BTCS have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PNPFF and BTCS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNPFF
1D Price
Change %
PNPFF100%
+1.28%
BTCS - PNPFF
15%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
ERNXY - PNPFF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
CNSRF - PNPFF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COIN - PNPFF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.24%
HOOD - PNPFF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
More