BTDPF
Price
$4.97
Change
-$0.03 (-0.60%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
7.22B
BTDPY
Price
$10.08
Change
-$0.08 (-0.79%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
7.22B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTDPF vs BTDPY

Header iconBTDPF vs BTDPY Comparison
Open Charts BTDPF vs BTDPYBanner chart's image
BARRATT REDROW
Price$4.97
Change-$0.03 (-0.60%)
Volume$2.46K
Capitalization7.22B
BARRATT REDROW
Price$10.08
Change-$0.08 (-0.79%)
Volume$73.29K
Capitalization7.22B
BTDPF vs BTDPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BTDPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTDPF vs. BTDPY commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To understand the difference between Barratt Developments plc (BTDPF) vs. Barratt Developments plc - ADR (BTDPY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR

ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BTDPF: $4.97 vs. BTDPY: $10.08)
Brand notoriety: BTDPF and BTDPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Homebuilding industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTDPF: 19% vs. BTDPY: 140%
Market capitalization -- BTDPF: $7.22B vs. BTDPY: $7.22B
BTDPF [@Homebuilding] is valued at $7.22B. BTDPY’s [@Homebuilding] market capitalization is $7.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Homebuilding] industry ranges from $49.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Homebuilding] industry is $6.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTDPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBTDPY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BTDPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BTDPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BTDPF and BTDPY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTDPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BTDPY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTDPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BTDPY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTDPY is a better buy in the short-term than BTDPF.

Price Growth

BTDPF (@Homebuilding) experienced а -0.50% price change this week, while BTDPY (@Homebuilding) price change was -1.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was -1.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Homebuilding (-1.93% weekly)

Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTDPF($7.22B) and BTDPY($7.22B) have the same market capitalization . BTDPY (28.02) and BTDPF (27.66) have similar P/E ratio . BTDPF YTD gains are higher at: -8.879 vs. BTDPY (-9.891). BTDPF (285M) and BTDPY (285M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . BTDPF (4.6B) and BTDPY (4.6B) have equivalent revenues.
BTDPFBTDPYBTDPF / BTDPY
Capitalization7.22B7.22B100%
EBITDA285M285M100%
Gain YTD-8.879-9.89190%
P/E Ratio27.6628.0299%
Revenue4.6B4.6B100%
Total Cash655MN/A-
Total Debt260MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTDPF vs BTDPY: Fundamental Ratings
BTDPF
BTDPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
968
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9191
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8181
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8584
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTDPF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as BTDPY (14). This means that BTDPF’s stock grew similarly to BTDPY’s over the last 12 months.

BTDPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BTDPY (100). This means that BTDPF’s stock grew similarly to BTDPY’s over the last 12 months.

BTDPF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as BTDPY (91). This means that BTDPF’s stock grew similarly to BTDPY’s over the last 12 months.

BTDPF's Price Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as BTDPY (81). This means that BTDPF’s stock grew similarly to BTDPY’s over the last 12 months.

BTDPY's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as BTDPF (85). This means that BTDPY’s stock grew similarly to BTDPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTDPFBTDPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BTDPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIMZ21.321.19
+5.91%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF
EFFE23.840.78
+3.38%
Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF
USO76.990.60
+0.79%
United States Oil
AMDY7.660.03
+0.39%
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
SCDL38.60N/A
N/A
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Div Fctr TR ETN

BTDPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTDPF and BTDPY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTDPF and BTDPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTDPF
1D Price
Change %
BTDPF100%
-0.50%
BTDPY - BTDPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
PSMMY - BTDPF
19%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
PSMMF - BTDPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BVHMF - BTDPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NOBH - BTDPF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
More

BTDPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTDPY has been closely correlated with PSMMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BTDPY jumps, then PSMMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTDPY
1D Price
Change %
BTDPY100%
-0.79%
PSMMY - BTDPY
69%
Closely correlated
-2.08%
PHM - BTDPY
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.65%
TMHC - BTDPY
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.94%
TPH - BTDPY
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
MHO - BTDPY
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.35%
More