BTDPF
Price
$6.47
Change
+$0.16 (+2.54%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.72B
BVHMF
Price
$8.27
Change
-$0.01 (-0.12%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.51B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTDPF vs BVHMF

Header iconBTDPF vs BVHMF Comparison
Open Charts BTDPF vs BVHMFBanner chart's image
BARRATT REDROW
Price$6.47
Change+$0.16 (+2.54%)
Volume$40.2K
Capitalization5.72B
VISTRY GROUP
Price$8.27
Change-$0.01 (-0.12%)
Volume$3.21K
Capitalization3.51B
BTDPF vs BVHMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BVHMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTDPF vs. BVHMF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTDPF is a Buy and BVHMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BTDPF: $6.47 vs. BVHMF: $8.27)
Brand notoriety: BTDPF and BVHMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Homebuilding industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTDPF: 213% vs. BVHMF: 22%
Market capitalization -- BTDPF: $5.72B vs. BVHMF: $3.51B
BTDPF [@Homebuilding] is valued at $5.72B. BVHMF’s [@Homebuilding] market capitalization is $3.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Homebuilding] industry ranges from $53.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Homebuilding] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTDPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBVHMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BTDPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BVHMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTDPF is a better buy in the long-term than BVHMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTDPF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BVHMF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTDPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • BVHMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTDPF is a better buy in the short-term than BVHMF.

Price Growth

BTDPF (@Homebuilding) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BVHMF (@Homebuilding) price change was +3.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +2.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.07%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Homebuilding (+2.42% weekly)

Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTDPF($5.72B) has a higher market cap than BVHMF($3.51B). BVHMF has higher P/E ratio than BTDPF: BVHMF (8.96) vs BTDPF (8.11). BTDPF YTD gains are higher at: 18.438 vs. BVHMF (11.606). BTDPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 768M vs. BVHMF (325M). BTDPF has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. BVHMF (428M). BTDPF has less debt than BVHMF: BTDPF (242M) vs BVHMF (341M). BTDPF has higher revenues than BVHMF: BTDPF (5.81B) vs BVHMF (2.39B).
BTDPFBVHMFBTDPF / BVHMF
Capitalization5.72B3.51B163%
EBITDA768M325M236%
Gain YTD18.43811.606159%
P/E Ratio8.118.9691%
Revenue5.81B2.39B243%
Total Cash1.17B428M272%
Total Debt242M341M71%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTDPF vs BVHMF: Fundamental Ratings
BTDPF
BVHMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5069
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8991
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4062
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
922
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5024

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTDPF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as BVHMF (32). This means that BTDPF’s stock grew similarly to BVHMF’s over the last 12 months.

BTDPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BVHMF (100). This means that BTDPF’s stock grew similarly to BVHMF’s over the last 12 months.

BTDPF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as BVHMF (91). This means that BTDPF’s stock grew similarly to BVHMF’s over the last 12 months.

BTDPF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as BVHMF (62). This means that BTDPF’s stock grew similarly to BVHMF’s over the last 12 months.

BTDPF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as BVHMF (22). This means that BTDPF’s stock grew similarly to BVHMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTDPFBVHMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BVHMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OIEJX25.710.09
+0.35%
JPMorgan Equity Income R6
CHTTX21.86N/A
N/A
AMG River Road Mid Cap Value N
GGOAX13.48N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth A
CLXRX59.33N/A
N/A
Columbia Large Cap Index Inst2
LFVCX27.40N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value C

BTDPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTDPF and BTDPY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTDPF and BTDPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTDPF
1D Price
Change %
BTDPF100%
N/A
BTDPY - BTDPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
PSMMY - BTDPF
19%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
PSMMF - BTDPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BVHMF - BTDPF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
NOBH - BTDPF
1%
Poorly correlated
-4.06%
More

BVHMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BVHMF and BTDPY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BVHMF and BTDPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BVHMF
1D Price
Change %
BVHMF100%
-0.12%
BTDPY - BVHMF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
LEGH - BVHMF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
PSMMY - BVHMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
VNJA - BVHMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVCO - BVHMF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
More