BTDPF
Price
$4.97
Change
-$0.03 (-0.60%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
7.22B
BVHMF
Price
$8.23
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.77B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTDPF vs BVHMF

Header iconBTDPF vs BVHMF Comparison
Open Charts BTDPF vs BVHMFBanner chart's image
BARRATT REDROW
Price$4.97
Change-$0.03 (-0.60%)
Volume$2.46K
Capitalization7.22B
VISTRY GROUP
Price$8.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$72.39K
Capitalization2.77B
BTDPF vs BVHMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BVHMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTDPF vs. BVHMF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTDPF is a Hold and BVHMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BTDPF: $4.97 vs. BVHMF: $8.23)
Brand notoriety: BTDPF and BVHMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Homebuilding industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTDPF: 19% vs. BVHMF: 558%
Market capitalization -- BTDPF: $7.22B vs. BVHMF: $2.77B
BTDPF [@Homebuilding] is valued at $7.22B. BVHMF’s [@Homebuilding] market capitalization is $2.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Homebuilding] industry ranges from $49.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Homebuilding] industry is $6.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTDPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBVHMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BTDPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BVHMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BVHMF is a better buy in the long-term than BTDPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTDPF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BVHMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTDPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BVHMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTDPF is a better buy in the short-term than BVHMF.

Price Growth

BTDPF (@Homebuilding) experienced а -0.50% price change this week, while BVHMF (@Homebuilding) price change was -9.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was -1.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Homebuilding (-1.93% weekly)

Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTDPF($7.22B) has a higher market cap than BVHMF($2.77B). BVHMF has higher P/E ratio than BTDPF: BVHMF (54.34) vs BTDPF (27.66). BVHMF YTD gains are higher at: 11.066 vs. BTDPF (-8.879). BVHMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 415M vs. BTDPF (285M). BTDPF has higher revenues than BVHMF: BTDPF (4.6B) vs BVHMF (3.56B).
BTDPFBVHMFBTDPF / BVHMF
Capitalization7.22B2.77B261%
EBITDA285M415M69%
Gain YTD-8.87911.066-80%
P/E Ratio27.6654.3451%
Revenue4.6B3.56B129%
Total Cash655MN/A-
Total Debt260MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTDPF vs BVHMF: Fundamental Ratings
BTDPF
BVHMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9620
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9192
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8164
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
856
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4317

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTDPF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as BVHMF (25). This means that BTDPF’s stock grew similarly to BVHMF’s over the last 12 months.

BTDPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BVHMF (100). This means that BTDPF’s stock grew similarly to BVHMF’s over the last 12 months.

BTDPF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as BVHMF (92). This means that BTDPF’s stock grew similarly to BVHMF’s over the last 12 months.

BVHMF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as BTDPF (81). This means that BVHMF’s stock grew similarly to BTDPF’s over the last 12 months.

BVHMF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTDPF (85). This means that BVHMF’s stock grew significantly faster than BTDPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTDPFBVHMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BVHMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIMZ21.321.19
+5.91%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HIMS ETF
EFFE23.840.78
+3.38%
Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF
USO76.990.60
+0.79%
United States Oil
AMDY7.660.03
+0.39%
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
SCDL38.60N/A
N/A
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Div Fctr TR ETN

BTDPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTDPF and BTDPY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTDPF and BTDPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTDPF
1D Price
Change %
BTDPF100%
-0.50%
BTDPY - BTDPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
PSMMY - BTDPF
19%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
PSMMF - BTDPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BVHMF - BTDPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NOBH - BTDPF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
More

BVHMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BVHMF and BTDPY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BVHMF and BTDPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BVHMF
1D Price
Change %
BVHMF100%
N/A
BTDPY - BVHMF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
LEGH - BVHMF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
PSMMY - BVHMF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
VNJA - BVHMF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVCO - BVHMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
More