BTDPF
Price
$6.47
Change
+$0.16 (+2.54%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.72B
PSMMY
Price
$33.56
Change
-$2.68 (-7.40%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
4.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTDPF vs PSMMY

Header iconBTDPF vs PSMMY Comparison
Open Charts BTDPF vs PSMMYBanner chart's image
BARRATT REDROW
Price$6.47
Change+$0.16 (+2.54%)
Volume$40.2K
Capitalization5.72B
Persimmon
Price$33.56
Change-$2.68 (-7.40%)
Volume$21.37K
Capitalization4.76B
BTDPF vs PSMMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSMMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTDPF vs. PSMMY commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTDPF is a Buy and PSMMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (BTDPF: $6.47 vs. PSMMY: $33.56)
Brand notoriety: BTDPF and PSMMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Homebuilding industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTDPF: 898% vs. PSMMY: 243%
Market capitalization -- BTDPF: $5.72B vs. PSMMY: $4.76B
BTDPF [@Homebuilding] is valued at $5.72B. PSMMY’s [@Homebuilding] market capitalization is $4.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Homebuilding] industry ranges from $53.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Homebuilding] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTDPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePSMMY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BTDPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PSMMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTDPF is a better buy in the long-term than PSMMY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTDPF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSMMY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTDPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PSMMY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PSMMY is a better buy in the short-term than BTDPF.

Price Growth

BTDPF (@Homebuilding) experienced а +2.48% price change this week, while PSMMY (@Homebuilding) price change was -8.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

PSMMY is expected to report earnings on Mar 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Homebuilding (+0.52% weekly)

Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTDPF($5.72B) has a higher market cap than PSMMY($4.76B). BTDPF has higher P/E ratio than PSMMY: BTDPF (8.11) vs PSMMY (6.57). BTDPF YTD gains are higher at: 18.438 vs. PSMMY (15.238). BTDPF (768M) and PSMMY (751M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . BTDPF has higher revenues than PSMMY: BTDPF (5.81B) vs PSMMY (3.82B).
BTDPFPSMMYBTDPF / PSMMY
Capitalization5.72B4.76B120%
EBITDA768M751M102%
Gain YTD18.43815.238121%
P/E Ratio8.116.57124%
Revenue5.81B3.82B152%
Total Cash1.17BN/A-
Total Debt242MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTDPF vs PSMMY: Fundamental Ratings
BTDPF
PSMMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
503
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8981
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
875
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSMMY's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as BTDPF (22). This means that PSMMY’s stock grew similarly to BTDPF’s over the last 12 months.

PSMMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BTDPF (100). This means that PSMMY’s stock grew similarly to BTDPF’s over the last 12 months.

PSMMY's SMR Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as BTDPF (89). This means that PSMMY’s stock grew similarly to BTDPF’s over the last 12 months.

BTDPF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as PSMMY (45). This means that BTDPF’s stock grew similarly to PSMMY’s over the last 12 months.

BTDPF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PSMMY (75). This means that BTDPF’s stock grew significantly faster than PSMMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTDPFPSMMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTDPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSMMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IHAK53.000.14
+0.26%
iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF
CADCNY5.25N/A
N/A
Canadian Dollar - China Yuan
CNYGBP0.10N/A
N/A
China Yuan - United Kingdom Pound
GBPEUR1.16N/A
N/A
United Kingdom Pound - Euro
NZDCAD0.83N/A
N/A
New Zealand Dollar - Canadian Dollar

BTDPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTDPF and BTDPY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTDPF and BTDPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTDPF
1D Price
Change %
BTDPF100%
N/A
BTDPY - BTDPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-5.33%
PSMMY - BTDPF
19%
Poorly correlated
-7.41%
PSMMF - BTDPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BVHMF - BTDPF
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.95%
NOBH - BTDPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PSMMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PSMMY has been closely correlated with BTDPY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PSMMY jumps, then BTDPY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSMMY
1D Price
Change %
PSMMY100%
-7.41%
BTDPY - PSMMY
69%
Closely correlated
-5.33%
TPH - PSMMY
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
KBH - PSMMY
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
TMHC - PSMMY
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
TWODY - PSMMY
50%
Loosely correlated
-4.86%
More