BTDPY
Price
$12.05
Change
+$0.14 (+1.18%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
5.85B
MHO
Price
$107.05
Change
-$2.41 (-2.20%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
3.79B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTDPY vs MHO

Header iconBTDPY vs MHO Comparison
Open Charts BTDPY vs MHOBanner chart's image
BARRATT REDROW
Price$12.05
Change+$0.14 (+1.18%)
Volume$7.96K
Capitalization5.85B
M/I Homes
Price$107.05
Change-$2.41 (-2.20%)
Volume$214.2K
Capitalization3.79B
BTDPY vs MHO Comparison Chart
Loading...
BTDPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MHO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTDPY vs. MHO commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTDPY is a Hold and MHO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BTDPY: $12.05 vs. MHO: $107.05)
Brand notoriety: BTDPY and MHO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Homebuilding industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTDPY: 28% vs. MHO: 87%
Market capitalization -- BTDPY: $5.85B vs. MHO: $3.79B
BTDPY [@Homebuilding] is valued at $5.85B. MHO’s [@Homebuilding] market capitalization is $3.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Homebuilding] industry ranges from $53.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Homebuilding] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTDPY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMHO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTDPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MHO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MHO is a better buy in the long-term than BTDPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTDPY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MHO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTDPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MHO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MHO is a better buy in the short-term than BTDPY.

Price Growth

BTDPY (@Homebuilding) experienced а -2.82% price change this week, while MHO (@Homebuilding) price change was +0.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

MHO is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Homebuilding (+0.95% weekly)

Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTDPY($5.85B) has a higher market cap than MHO($3.79B). BTDPY has higher P/E ratio than MHO: BTDPY (21.53) vs MHO (8.17). BTDPY YTD gains are higher at: 7.719 vs. MHO (-19.481). MHO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 602M vs. BTDPY (372M). BTDPY has more cash in the bank: 950M vs. MHO (733M). BTDPY has less debt than MHO: BTDPY (246M) vs MHO (917M). BTDPY has higher revenues than MHO: BTDPY (4.39B) vs MHO (4.03B).
BTDPYMHOBTDPY / MHO
Capitalization5.85B3.79B154%
EBITDA372M602M62%
Gain YTD7.719-19.481-40%
P/E Ratio21.538.17264%
Revenue4.39B4.03B109%
Total Cash950M733M130%
Total Debt246M917M27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTDPY vs MHO: Fundamental Ratings
BTDPY
MHO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5070
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8036
SMR RATING
1..100
9147
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5662
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1078
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTDPY's Valuation (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MHO (64) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that BTDPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MHO’s over the last 12 months.

MHO's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTDPY (80) in the null industry. This means that MHO’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTDPY’s over the last 12 months.

MHO's SMR Rating (47) in the Homebuilding industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTDPY (91) in the null industry. This means that MHO’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTDPY’s over the last 12 months.

BTDPY's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as MHO (62) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that BTDPY’s stock grew similarly to MHO’s over the last 12 months.

BTDPY's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MHO (78) in the Homebuilding industry. This means that BTDPY’s stock grew significantly faster than MHO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTDPYMHO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTDPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MHO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RBGPF69.041.08
+1.59%
Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc.
GRAM0.04N/A
N/A
GOLD FLORA CORP.
BDNNY63.72-0.48
-0.74%
Boliden AB
EDPFY40.17-0.30
-0.75%
EDP S.A.
ARREF1.38-0.01
-1.07%
Amerigo Resources Ltd.

BTDPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTDPY has been closely correlated with PSMMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BTDPY jumps, then PSMMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTDPY
1D Price
Change %
BTDPY100%
+1.18%
PSMMY - BTDPY
69%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
PHM - BTDPY
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
TMHC - BTDPY
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.55%
TPH - BTDPY
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
MHO - BTDPY
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.20%
More

MHO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MHO has been closely correlated with KBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MHO jumps, then KBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MHO
1D Price
Change %
MHO100%
-2.20%
KBH - MHO
89%
Closely correlated
-2.51%
TMHC - MHO
88%
Closely correlated
-1.55%
MTH - MHO
88%
Closely correlated
-1.90%
CCS - MHO
87%
Closely correlated
-1.95%
PHM - MHO
86%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
More