BTDPY
Price
$10.01
Change
+$0.25 (+2.56%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
7.03B
UHG
Price
$4.23
Change
+$0.08 (+1.93%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
248.74M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTDPY vs UHG

Header iconBTDPY vs UHG Comparison
Open Charts BTDPY vs UHGBanner chart's image
BARRATT REDROW
Price$10.01
Change+$0.25 (+2.56%)
Volume$33.53K
Capitalization7.03B
United Homes Group
Price$4.23
Change+$0.08 (+1.93%)
Volume$32.08K
Capitalization248.74M
BTDPY vs UHG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTDPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTDPY vs. UHG commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTDPY is a Hold and UHG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BTDPY: $10.01 vs. UHG: $4.23)
Brand notoriety: BTDPY and UHG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Homebuilding industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTDPY: 65% vs. UHG: 19%
Market capitalization -- BTDPY: $7.03B vs. UHG: $248.74M
BTDPY [@Homebuilding] is valued at $7.03B. UHG’s [@Homebuilding] market capitalization is $248.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Homebuilding] industry ranges from $54.2B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Homebuilding] industry is $7.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTDPY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUHG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BTDPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UHG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UHG is a better buy in the long-term than BTDPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTDPY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UHG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTDPY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UHG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTDPY is a better buy in the short-term than UHG.

Price Growth

BTDPY (@Homebuilding) experienced а +2.46% price change this week, while UHG (@Homebuilding) price change was +1.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Homebuilding industry was +6.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Homebuilding (+6.03% weekly)

Homebuilding includes companies residential home construction companies, renovators and repair firms. The companies may be building single-family or multifamily homes, condominiums or mobile homes. Over the five years to 2019, the Home Builders industry is estimated to have grown at an annualized rate of 2.5% to reach $89.4 billion, (including expected growth of 2.6% in 2019), according to a study by IbisWorld. After having suffered one of its worst crises a decade ago during the last macroeconomic recession–which had much of its origins in U.S. real estate – the homebuilding industry has been recovering steadily so far. Higher disposable incomes and improving economic activity have bolstered consumers’ purchases of homes. While revenue of the Home Builders industry remains well below its prerecession high, demand growth estimates show promise.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTDPY($7.03B) has a higher market cap than UHG($249M). UHG has higher P/E ratio than BTDPY: UHG (84.60) vs BTDPY (36.15). UHG YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. BTDPY (-10.517). BTDPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 285M vs. UHG (7.68M). BTDPY has higher revenues than UHG: BTDPY (4.6B) vs UHG (446M).
BTDPYUHGBTDPY / UHG
Capitalization7.03B249M2,822%
EBITDA285M7.68M3,711%
Gain YTD-10.5170.000-
P/E Ratio36.1584.6043%
Revenue4.6B446M1,031%
Total CashN/A36.5M-
Total DebtN/A134M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTDPY: Fundamental Ratings
BTDPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTDPYUHG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTDPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UHG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NWINF1.130.01
+0.89%
Naked Wines PLC
ASAZF34.98N/A
N/A
Assa Abloy AB
HYPOF214.70N/A
N/A
Hypoport AG
LNSPF2.69N/A
N/A
London & Stamford Property PLC
NMGX0.50N/A
N/A
NANO MAGIC INC.

BTDPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTDPY has been closely correlated with PSMMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BTDPY jumps, then PSMMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTDPY
1D Price
Change %
BTDPY100%
+2.56%
PSMMY - BTDPY
69%
Closely correlated
+3.02%
PHM - BTDPY
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.15%
TMHC - BTDPY
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.48%
TPH - BTDPY
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.29%
MHO - BTDPY
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.99%
More

UHG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UHG and BTDPY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UHG and BTDPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UHG
1D Price
Change %
UHG100%
+1.93%
BTDPY - UHG
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.56%
TPH - UHG
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.29%
PSMMY - UHG
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.02%
LEN - UHG
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.76%
KBH - UHG
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.06%
More