BTE
Price
$2.18
Change
-$0.08 (-3.54%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.69B
54 days until earnings call
CRLFF
Price
$5.24
Change
-$0.10 (-1.87%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
846.2M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTE vs CRLFF

Header iconBTE vs CRLFF Comparison
Open Charts BTE vs CRLFFBanner chart's image
Baytex Energy
Price$2.18
Change-$0.08 (-3.54%)
Volume$26.62M
Capitalization1.69B
Cardinal Energy
Price$5.24
Change-$0.10 (-1.87%)
Volume$34.07K
Capitalization846.2M
BTE vs CRLFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTE vs. CRLFF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTE is a Hold and CRLFF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BTE: $2.18 vs. CRLFF: $5.24)
Brand notoriety: BTE and CRLFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTE: 102% vs. CRLFF: 44%
Market capitalization -- BTE: $1.69B vs. CRLFF: $846.2M
BTE [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $1.69B. CRLFF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $846.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $116.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCRLFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BTE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CRLFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRLFF is a better buy in the long-term than BTE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRLFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CRLFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTE is a better buy in the short-term than CRLFF.

Price Growth

BTE (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -2.24% price change this week, while CRLFF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -1.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

BTE is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.25% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTE($1.69B) has a higher market cap than CRLFF($846M). CRLFF has higher P/E ratio than BTE: CRLFF (13.14) vs BTE (6.40). CRLFF YTD gains are higher at: 16.331 vs. BTE (-15.504). BTE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.02B vs. CRLFF (226M). CRLFF has less debt than BTE: CRLFF (199M) vs BTE (2.13B). BTE has higher revenues than CRLFF: BTE (3.98B) vs CRLFF (578M).
BTECRLFFBTE / CRLFF
Capitalization1.69B846M200%
EBITDA2.02B226M895%
Gain YTD-15.50416.331-95%
P/E Ratio6.4013.1449%
Revenue3.98B578M688%
Total Cash7.16MN/A-
Total Debt2.13B199M1,068%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTE vs CRLFF: Fundamental Ratings
BTE
CRLFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
410
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7738
SMR RATING
1..100
7371
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5047
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8817
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1128

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRLFF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as BTE (28). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to BTE’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTE (77). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTE’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's SMR Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as BTE (73). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to BTE’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as BTE (50). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to BTE’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTE (88). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew significantly faster than BTE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTECRLFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
80%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
THIGX36.720.07
+0.19%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth I
RYOCX92.27N/A
N/A
Rydex NASDAQ-100® Inv
NPNRX49.98N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value R3
MSJAX19.41N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Global Endurance A
DCUAX14.85N/A
N/A
DWS CROCI US A

BTE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTE has been closely correlated with VET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BTE jumps, then VET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTE
1D Price
Change %
BTE100%
-3.54%
VET - BTE
86%
Closely correlated
-2.67%
OVV - BTE
85%
Closely correlated
-3.54%
MTDR - BTE
83%
Closely correlated
-3.54%
DVN - BTE
82%
Closely correlated
-2.30%
PR - BTE
82%
Closely correlated
-3.14%
More

CRLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRLFF has been closely correlated with ZPTAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRLFF jumps, then ZPTAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRLFF
1D Price
Change %
CRLFF100%
-1.91%
ZPTAF - CRLFF
76%
Closely correlated
-3.43%
BTE - CRLFF
74%
Closely correlated
-3.54%
TNEYF - CRLFF
73%
Closely correlated
-1.54%
VET - CRLFF
72%
Closely correlated
-2.67%
OBE - CRLFF
71%
Closely correlated
-3.31%
More