Ad is loading...
BTEUX vs CCIZX
BTEUX vs CCIZX Comparison
Open Charts BTEUX vs CCIZX
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info Inst
Price$125.74
Change+$4.44 (+3.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.36B
BTEUX vs CCIZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCIZX has more cash in the bank: 11.4B vs. BTEUX (50.4M). BTEUX (0.00) and CCIZX (0.00) have matching dividends . BTEUX was incepted earlier than CCIZX: BTEUX (3 years) vs CCIZX (15 years). BTEUX (3.80) is less costly to investors than CCIZX (0.93). CCIZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. BTEUX (27.21). CCIZX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTEUX: CCIZX (2000) vs BTEUX (5000000). BTEUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.14 vs. CCIZX (-10.23).
| BTEUX | CCIZX | BTEUX / CCIZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.93 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.80 | 0.93 | 409% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.797 | -18.201 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2000 | 250,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.4M | 11.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.14 | -10.23 | -138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.09 | -0.62 | -8,365% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 53.41 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NUMG | 42.39 | 1.13 | +2.74% |
| Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF | |||
| INDS | 35.54 | 0.25 | +0.70% |
| Pacer Benchmark Industrial RE SCTR ETF | |||
| XFIX | 51.10 | 0.19 | +0.36% |
| F/m Opportunistic Income ETF | |||
| TVE | 23.33 | 0.03 | +0.13% |
| Tennessee Valley Authority Power Bonds 1999 Series A due May 1 2029 | |||
| FSTA | 51.07 | -0.53 | -1.03% |
| Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | |||