BTG vs KGC
B2Gold Corp (BTG) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) are both gold-mining companies based in Canada with mining operations across several continents. Kinross is approximately twice as large as B2Gold, with an enterprise value of approximately $8B as opposed to BTG’s EV of $3.78B. EBITDA of BTG is about $1B, and about $2B for KGC. Kinross digs up the majority of its gold in the United States, with two mines in Nevada and one in Alaska. It also has mines in Brazil, Russia, Mauritania, and Ghana, for a total of 8 major mining operations. BTG only has 3 operational mines at the time of this writing, but with exploration properties in several other countries. BTG’s financials show a better return on assets and return on equity than KGC, and they also boast a higher dividend yield. Of course that higher dividend is associated with a higher payout ratio of 30%, while KCG’s is only about 12%. KGC’s diluted earnings per share looks better than its counterpart, as does its enterprise-value-to-revenue ratio.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BTG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKGC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BTG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- KGC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BTG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BTG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KGC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BTG (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.00% price change this week, while KGC (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.94% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.28%.
Reported Earning Dates
BTG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
KGC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (+2.49% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| BTG | KGC | BTG / KGC | |
| Capitalization | 3.42B | 7.52B | 46% |
| EBITDA | 737M | 1.76B | 42% |
| Gain YTD | 24.681 | 59.762 | 41% |
| P/E Ratio | 264.00 | 18.12 | 1,457% |
| Revenue | 1.93B | 4.24B | 46% |
| Total Cash | 307M | 352M | 87% |
| Total Debt | 192M | 2.26B | 8% |
BTG | KGC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 78 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 9 Undervalued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BTG's Valuation (9) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as KGC (18). This means that BTG’s stock grew similarly to KGC’s over the last 12 months.
KGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTG (100). This means that KGC’s stock grew significantly faster than BTG’s over the last 12 months.
KGC's SMR Rating (62) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BTG (92). This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to BTG’s over the last 12 months.
KGC's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as BTG (40). This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to BTG’s over the last 12 months.
BTG's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for KGC (74). This means that BTG’s stock grew significantly faster than KGC’s over the last 12 months.
| BTG | KGC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 7 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 78% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DEVCX | 45.25 | 0.73 | +1.64% |
| Macquarie Small Cap Value C | |||
| RPMNX | 17.01 | 0.18 | +1.07% |
| Reinhart Mid Cap PMV Institutional | |||
| ABCRX | 21.53 | 0.02 | +0.09% |
| American Beacon The London Co Inc Eq R6 | |||
| VTMNX | 17.22 | N/A | N/A |
| Vanguard Developed Markets Index Instl | |||
| GCSIX | 24.91 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts Instl | |||
BTG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTG has been closely correlated with AGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BTG jumps, then AGI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BTG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTG | 100% | -2.27% | ||
| AGI - BTG | 72% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| GOLD - BTG | 72% Closely correlated | -2.78% | ||
| AEM - BTG | 72% Closely correlated | -2.25% | ||
| PAAS - BTG | 71% Closely correlated | +3.99% | ||
| WPM - BTG | 69% Closely correlated | -2.92% | ||
More | ||||
KGC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KGC has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KGC jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KGC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KGC | 100% | -5.38% | ||
| AEM - KGC | 84% Closely correlated | -2.25% | ||
| AGI - KGC | 80% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| WPM - KGC | 80% Closely correlated | -2.92% | ||
| GOLD - KGC | 76% Closely correlated | -2.78% | ||
| PAAS - KGC | 75% Closely correlated | +3.99% | ||
More | ||||