Ad is loading...
BTGGF
Price
$63.22
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
OFSTF
Price
$0.33
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

BTGGF vs OFSTF

Header iconBTGGF vs OFSTF Comparison
Open Charts BTGGF vs OFSTFBanner chart's image
Bitcoin Group SE
Price$63.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15.49K
CapitalizationN/A
Carbon Streaming
Price$0.33
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20.06K
CapitalizationN/A
BTGGF vs OFSTF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTGGF vs. OFSTF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTGGF is a Hold and OFSTF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BTGGF: $63.22 vs. OFSTF: $0.33)
Brand notoriety: BTGGF and OFSTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTGGF: 763% vs. OFSTF: 118%
Market capitalization -- BTGGF: $118.22M vs. OFSTF: $234.77M
BTGGF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $118.22M. OFSTF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $234.77M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTGGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOFSTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTGGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OFSTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTGGF is a better buy in the long-term than OFSTF.

Price Growth

BTGGF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OFSTF (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

OFSTF is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.35% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OFSTF($235M) has a higher market cap than BTGGF($118M). OFSTF has higher P/E ratio than BTGGF: OFSTF (117.65) vs BTGGF (101.01). BTGGF YTD gains are higher at: 125.778 vs. OFSTF (-51.471). BTGGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 19.9M vs. OFSTF (-6.13M). OFSTF has more cash in the bank: 134M vs. BTGGF (20.3M). OFSTF has less debt than BTGGF: OFSTF (67.6K) vs BTGGF (506K). BTGGF has higher revenues than OFSTF: BTGGF (25.4M) vs OFSTF (0).
BTGGFOFSTFBTGGF / OFSTF
Capitalization118M235M50%
EBITDA19.9M-6.13M-324%
Gain YTD125.778-51.471-244%
P/E Ratio101.01117.6586%
Revenue25.4M0-
Total Cash20.3M134M15%
Total Debt506K67.6K749%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
OFSTF: Fundamental Ratings
OFSTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DADA1.380.01
+0.73%
Dada Nexus Limited
BOKF114.660.59
+0.52%
BOK Financial Corp
BKTI31.690.06
+0.19%
BK Technologies Corp
BMO93.18-0.22
-0.24%
Bank of Montreal
HTLF65.58-0.49
-0.74%
Heartland Financial USA

BTGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTGGF and CYMBF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTGGF and CYMBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTGGF
1D Price
Change %
BTGGF100%
N/A
CYMBF - BTGGF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HALFF - BTGGF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.83%
PSEC - BTGGF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
KROEF - BTGGF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
OFSTF - BTGGF
3%
Poorly correlated
+10.00%
More

OFSTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OFSTF and TEKCF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OFSTF and TEKCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OFSTF
1D Price
Change %
OFSTF100%
+10.00%
TEKCF - OFSTF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VINP - OFSTF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
AGNMF - OFSTF
7%
Poorly correlated
-9.09%
JTCPF - OFSTF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OWL - OFSTF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
More