BTGHF
Price
$0.13
Change
+$0.02 (+18.18%)
Updated
Feb 14 closing price
Capitalization
182M
SMSI
Price
$1.39
Change
-$0.04 (-2.80%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
25.49M
Ad is loading...

BTGHF vs SMSI

Header iconBTGHF vs SMSI Comparison
Open Charts BTGHF vs SMSIBanner chart's image
BIGTINCAN
Price$0.13
Change+$0.02 (+18.18%)
Volume$13.52K
Capitalization182M
Smith Micro Software
Price$1.39
Change-$0.04 (-2.80%)
Volume$148.11K
Capitalization25.49M
BTGHF vs SMSI Comparison Chart
Loading...
SMSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTGHF vs. SMSI commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTGHF is a Hold and SMSI is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (BTGHF: $0.13 vs. SMSI: $1.39)
Brand notoriety: BTGHF and SMSI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTGHF: 563% vs. SMSI: 33%
Market capitalization -- BTGHF: $182M vs. SMSI: $25.49M
BTGHF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $182M. SMSI’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $25.49M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTGHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMSI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BTGHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMSI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMSI is a better buy in the long-term than BTGHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMSI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SMSI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BTGHF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SMSI (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

SMSI is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.81% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTGHF($182M) has a higher market cap than SMSI($25.5M). BTGHF YTD gains are higher at: 14.740 vs. SMSI (6.107). SMSI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -10.49M vs. BTGHF (-26.56M). BTGHF has more cash in the bank: 71.4M vs. SMSI (7.13M). BTGHF has less debt than SMSI: BTGHF (2.08M) vs SMSI (3.26M). BTGHF has higher revenues than SMSI: BTGHF (122M) vs SMSI (40.9M).
BTGHFSMSIBTGHF / SMSI
Capitalization182M25.5M714%
EBITDA-26.56M-10.49M253%
Gain YTD14.7406.107241%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue122M40.9M298%
Total Cash71.4M7.13M1,002%
Total Debt2.08M3.26M64%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMSI: Fundamental Ratings
SMSI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMSI
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SMSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVO12.330.01
+0.08%
Mission Produce
CISO1.05N/A
N/A
CISO Global
WHD58.38-1.31
-2.19%
Cactus
CYBN9.09-0.24
-2.57%
Cybin Inc
HOOD51.60-4.46
-7.96%
Robinhood Markets

BTGHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTGHF and SMSI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTGHF and SMSI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTGHF
1D Price
Change %
BTGHF100%
N/A
SMSI - BTGHF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.80%
ASFT - BTGHF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWLKF - BTGHF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BIDCF - BTGHF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBLR - BTGHF
4%
Poorly correlated
+28.00%
More

SMSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMSI has been closely correlated with NUTX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMSI jumps, then NUTX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMSI
1D Price
Change %
SMSI100%
-2.80%
NUTX - SMSI
87%
Closely correlated
-6.57%
COIN - SMSI
49%
Loosely correlated
-8.27%
CLSK - SMSI
35%
Loosely correlated
-8.05%
RIOT - SMSI
33%
Loosely correlated
-9.83%
XBP - SMSI
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
More