BTGOF
Price
$1.85
Change
-$0.02 (-1.07%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
CPROF
Price
$1.21
Change
+$0.06 (+5.22%)
Updated
Dec 9 closing price
Ad is loading...

BTGOF vs CPROF

Header iconBTGOF vs CPROF Comparison
Open Charts BTGOF vs CPROFBanner chart's image
BT Group
Price$1.85
Change-$0.02 (-1.07%)
Volume$12.69K
CapitalizationN/A
Cortelco Systems Puerto Ri
Price$1.21
Change+$0.06 (+5.22%)
Volume$375
CapitalizationN/A
BTGOF vs CPROF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BTGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CPROF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTGOF vs. CPROF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTGOF is a StrongSell and CPROF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BTGOF: $1.85 vs. CPROF: $1.21)
Brand notoriety: BTGOF and CPROF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTGOF: 36% vs. CPROF: 142%
Market capitalization -- BTGOF: $15.58B vs. CPROF: $714.84K
BTGOF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $15.58B. CPROF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $714.84K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTGOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCPROF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BTGOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CPROF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BTGOF and CPROF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTGOF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CPROF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTGOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • CPROF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPROF is a better buy in the short-term than BTGOF.

Price Growth

BTGOF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -0.54% price change this week, while CPROF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was -0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +84.09%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (-0.72% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTGOF($15.6B) has a higher market cap than CPROF($715K). CPROF YTD gains are higher at: 20.476 vs. BTGOF (15.625).
BTGOFCPROFBTGOF / CPROF
Capitalization15.6B715K2,181,818%
EBITDA7.47BN/A-
Gain YTD15.62520.47676%
P/E Ratio6.46N/A-
Revenue20.7BN/A-
Total Cash3.94BN/A-
Total Debt23.9BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTGOF vs CPROF: Fundamental Ratings
BTGOF
CPROF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8636
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1006
SMR RATING
1..100
9997
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5045
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPROF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as BTGOF (25). This means that CPROF’s stock grew similarly to BTGOF’s over the last 12 months.

CPROF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTGOF (100). This means that CPROF’s stock grew significantly faster than BTGOF’s over the last 12 months.

CPROF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as BTGOF (99). This means that CPROF’s stock grew similarly to BTGOF’s over the last 12 months.

CPROF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as BTGOF (50). This means that CPROF’s stock grew similarly to BTGOF’s over the last 12 months.

BTGOF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CPROF (100). This means that BTGOF’s stock grew significantly faster than CPROF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTGOFCPROF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
63%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
69%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BTGOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CPROF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TPWCX21.60N/A
N/A
Nuveen Large Cap Responsible Eq Prem
LIDAX7.83-0.17
-2.13%
Lord Abbett International Value A
TFEQX11.72-0.27
-2.25%
Templeton Instl Intl Eq Ser Primary
QUACX27.97-1.30
-4.44%
AB Small Cap Growth C
RFNBX80.32-8.99
-10.07%
American Funds Fundamental Invs R2

BTGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTGOF and VOD have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTGOF and VOD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTGOF
1D Price
Change %
BTGOF100%
-1.07%
VOD - BTGOF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
TLSNY - BTGOF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
TLTZY - BTGOF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.72%
VODPF - BTGOF
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.24%
TELNY - BTGOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.69%
More

CPROF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPROF and BTGOF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPROF and BTGOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPROF
1D Price
Change %
CPROF100%
N/A
BTGOF - CPROF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.07%
BZQIF - CPROF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BGAOY - CPROF
0%
Poorly correlated
+4.86%
BZQIY - CPROF
0%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
CVHSY - CPROF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More