BTLCY
Price
$4.75
Change
+$0.04 (+0.85%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
4.03B
CUZ
Price
$28.17
Change
-$0.55 (-1.92%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.52B
13 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTLCY vs CUZ

Header iconBTLCY vs CUZ Comparison
Open Charts BTLCY vs CUZBanner chart's image
British Land Company (The)
Price$4.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.85%)
Volume$9.15K
Capitalization4.03B
Cousins Properties
Price$28.17
Change-$0.55 (-1.92%)
Volume$1.45M
Capitalization3.52B
BTLCY vs CUZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTLCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CUZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTLCY vs. CUZ commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTLCY is a Hold and CUZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BTLCY: $4.75 vs. CUZ: $28.17)
Brand notoriety: BTLCY and CUZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTLCY: 81% vs. CUZ: 87%
Market capitalization -- BTLCY: $4.03B vs. CUZ: $3.52B
BTLCY [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $4.03B. CUZ’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $3.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTLCY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCUZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BTLCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CUZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CUZ is a better buy in the long-term than BTLCY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTLCY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CUZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTLCY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CUZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CUZ is a better buy in the short-term than BTLCY.

Price Growth

BTLCY (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -1.86% price change this week, while CUZ (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -2.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

BTLCY is expected to report earnings on May 22, 2025.

CUZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.62% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTLCY($4.03B) has a higher market cap than CUZ($3.52B). CUZ has higher P/E ratio than BTLCY: CUZ (42.09) vs BTLCY (5.85). BTLCY YTD gains are higher at: 9.193 vs. CUZ (-5.060). CUZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 504M vs. BTLCY (-944M). BTLCY has more cash in the bank: 125M vs. CUZ (6.05M). BTLCY (2.39B) and CUZ (2.51B) have identical debt. CUZ has higher revenues than BTLCY: CUZ (803M) vs BTLCY (418M).
BTLCYCUZBTLCY / CUZ
Capitalization4.03B3.52B114%
EBITDA-944M504M-187%
Gain YTD9.193-5.060-182%
P/E Ratio5.8542.0914%
Revenue418M803M52%
Total Cash125M6.05M2,067%
Total Debt2.39B2.51B95%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTLCY vs CUZ: Fundamental Ratings
BTLCY
CUZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7151
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7681
SMR RATING
1..100
9388
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6156
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9512
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTLCY's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as CUZ (76) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that BTLCY’s stock grew similarly to CUZ’s over the last 12 months.

BTLCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as CUZ (81) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that BTLCY’s stock grew similarly to CUZ’s over the last 12 months.

CUZ's SMR Rating (88) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BTLCY (93) in the null industry. This means that CUZ’s stock grew similarly to BTLCY’s over the last 12 months.

CUZ's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BTLCY (61) in the null industry. This means that CUZ’s stock grew similarly to BTLCY’s over the last 12 months.

CUZ's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTLCY (95) in the null industry. This means that CUZ’s stock grew significantly faster than BTLCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTLCYCUZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTLCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CUZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DHANX16.43N/A
N/A
Centre American Select Equity Investor
BAFMX17.88N/A
N/A
Brown Advisory Mid-Cap Growth Instl
IOGYX36.96N/A
N/A
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals R5
MINRX35.41N/A
N/A
MFS International Intrinsic Value R1
ATWYX24.44N/A
N/A
AB Tax-Managed Wealth Apprec Strat Adv

BTLCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTLCY has been loosely correlated with GMRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BTLCY jumps, then GMRE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTLCY
1D Price
Change %
BTLCY100%
+0.82%
GMRE - BTLCY
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
CUZ - BTLCY
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.92%
SAFE - BTLCY
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
DEA - BTLCY
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
ARE - BTLCY
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
More

CUZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUZ has been closely correlated with HIW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CUZ jumps, then HIW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUZ
1D Price
Change %
CUZ100%
-1.92%
HIW - CUZ
85%
Closely correlated
-2.38%
BDN - CUZ
84%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
SLG - CUZ
78%
Closely correlated
-4.08%
KRC - CUZ
77%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
BXP - CUZ
77%
Closely correlated
-1.53%
More