Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTLKX vs RERHX
BTLKX vs RERHX Comparison
Open Charts BTLKX vs RERHX
Baillie Gifford Intl Concntr Gr EqsK
Price$9.44
Change-$0.03 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets107.75M
American Funds EUPAC R5E
Price$63.12
Change-$0.02 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.85B
BTLKX vs RERHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTLKX vs. RERHX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTLKX is a StrongBuy and RERHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERHX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. BTLKX (108M). RERHX pays higher dividends than BTLKX: RERHX (0.83) vs BTLKX (0.00). BTLKX was incepted earlier than RERHX: BTLKX (8 years) vs RERHX (10 years). BTLKX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RERHX (0.62). RERHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BTLKX (26.00). RERHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTLKX: RERHX (250) vs BTLKX (10000000). BTLKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.88 vs. RERHX (10.34). RERHX return over 5 years is better than : 15.16 vs. BTLKX (-50.41).
| BTLKX | RERHX | BTLKX / RERHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.62 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.62 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.077 | 18.535 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 250 | 4,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 108M | 135B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.83 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.88 | 10.34 | 260% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.09 | 37.66 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | -50.41 | 15.16 | -333% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement