BTM
Price
$3.83
Change
-$0.01 (-0.26%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
260.75M
IHLDF
Price
$0.14
Change
+$0.01 (+7.69%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
12.76M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTM vs IHLDF

Header iconBTM vs IHLDF Comparison
Open Charts BTM vs IHLDFBanner chart's image
Bitcoin Depot
Price$3.83
Change-$0.01 (-0.26%)
Volume$777.73K
Capitalization260.75M
Immutable Holdings
Price$0.14
Change+$0.01 (+7.69%)
Volume$7.14K
Capitalization12.76M
BTM vs IHLDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IHLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTM vs. IHLDF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTM is a Buy and IHLDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BTM: $3.83 vs. IHLDF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: BTM and IHLDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTM: 64% vs. IHLDF: 26%
Market capitalization -- BTM: $260.75M vs. IHLDF: $12.76M
BTM [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $260.75M. IHLDF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $12.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $10.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIHLDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IHLDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IHLDF is a better buy in the long-term than BTM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IHLDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IHLDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BTM and IHLDF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BTM (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.52% price change this week, while IHLDF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +1.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.94% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTM($261M) has a higher market cap than IHLDF($12.8M). BTM YTD gains are higher at: 136.420 vs. IHLDF (77.891). BTM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 58.9M vs. IHLDF (-2.04M). BTM has more cash in the bank: 48M vs. IHLDF (7.24M). BTM has higher revenues than IHLDF: BTM (608M) vs IHLDF (2.61M).
BTMIHLDFBTM / IHLDF
Capitalization261M12.8M2,039%
EBITDA58.9M-2.04M-2,884%
Gain YTD136.42077.891175%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue608M2.61M23,322%
Total Cash48M7.24M663%
Total Debt71.8MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTMIHLDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IHLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SE186.243.33
+1.82%
Sea Limited
OR31.230.14
+0.45%
OR Royalties Inc.
PRLB50.77-0.07
-0.14%
Proto Labs
HCAT3.65-0.04
-1.08%
Health Catalyst
LGL6.33-0.08
-1.26%
LGL Group (The)

BTM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTM has been loosely correlated with BTBT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BTM jumps, then BTBT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTM
1D Price
Change %
BTM100%
-0.26%
BTBT - BTM
42%
Loosely correlated
-4.74%
MARA - BTM
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
GREE - BTM
41%
Loosely correlated
-4.58%
ANY - BTM
37%
Loosely correlated
+9.99%
BITF - BTM
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
More

IHLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IHLDF and MEGL have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IHLDF and MEGL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IHLDF
1D Price
Change %
IHLDF100%
+3.93%
MEGL - IHLDF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
OLKR - IHLDF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MATEF - IHLDF
0%
Poorly correlated
-9.07%
BTM - IHLDF
-6%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
WAI - IHLDF
-6%
Poorly correlated
+34.64%
More