BTM
Price
$4.92
Change
-$0.10 (-1.99%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
23.38M
IHLDF
Price
$0.12
Change
+$0.02 (+20.00%)
Updated
Aug 6 closing price
Capitalization
2.71M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTM vs IHLDF

Header iconBTM vs IHLDF Comparison
Open Charts BTM vs IHLDFBanner chart's image
Bitcoin Depot
Price$4.92
Change-$0.10 (-1.99%)
Volume$3.34K
Capitalization23.38M
Immutable Holdings
Price$0.12
Change+$0.02 (+20.00%)
Volume$563
Capitalization2.71M
BTM vs IHLDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IHLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTM vs. IHLDF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTM is a Hold and IHLDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BTM: $4.97 vs. IHLDF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: BTM and IHLDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTM: 25% vs. IHLDF: 3%
Market capitalization -- BTM: $23.38M vs. IHLDF: $2.71M
BTM [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $23.38M. IHLDF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $2.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIHLDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IHLDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, IHLDF is a better buy in the long-term than BTM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTM’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IHLDF’s TA Score has 8 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTM’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IHLDF’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IHLDF is a better buy in the short-term than BTM.

Price Growth

BTM (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -0.40% price change this week, while IHLDF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -1.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.45%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.09% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTM($23.4M) has a higher market cap than IHLDF($2.71M). BTM YTD gains are higher at: 206.790 vs. IHLDF (57.116). BTM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.2M vs. IHLDF (-2.91M). BTM has more cash in the bank: 29.7M vs. IHLDF (16.9M). BTM has higher revenues than IHLDF: BTM (690M) vs IHLDF (9.41M).
BTMIHLDFBTM / IHLDF
Capitalization23.4M2.71M864%
EBITDA30.2M-2.91M-1,038%
Gain YTD206.79057.116362%
P/E Ratio3.36N/A-
Revenue690M9.41M7,336%
Total Cash29.7M16.9M176%
Total Debt34.5MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTMIHLDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IHLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GIGM1.520.04
+2.73%
GigaMedia Limited
WDC74.440.66
+0.89%
Western Digital Corp
ESHA11.10N/A
N/A
ESH Acquisition Corp
GHRS12.10-0.05
-0.41%
GH Research PLC
VNOM37.73-0.59
-1.54%
Viper Energy

BTM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTM has been loosely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BTM jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTM
1D Price
Change %
BTM100%
-1.19%
MARA - BTM
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
BTBT - BTM
40%
Loosely correlated
+9.21%
GREE - BTM
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.99%
CLSK - BTM
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.57%
RIOT - BTM
37%
Loosely correlated
+4.76%
More