Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTMFX vs FSMDX
BTMFX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts BTMFX vs FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.91
Change+$0.06 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.03B
BTMFX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTMFX vs. FSMDX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTMFX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45B vs. BTMFX (213M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than BTMFX: FSMDX (1.26) vs BTMFX (0.56). BTMFX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: BTMFX (18 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). BTMFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). BTMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.14 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTMFX: FSMDX (0) vs BTMFX (100000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.88 vs. BTMFX (-3.50). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 48.61 vs. BTMFX (24.85).
| BTMFX | FSMDX | BTMFX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.03 | 3,920% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.03 | 3,920% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.724 | 6.595 | 26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 213M | 45B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 1.26 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.50 | 1.88 | -186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.27 | 38.96 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.85 | 48.61 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.27 | 129.06 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers