Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTMKX vs VFWPX
BTMKX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts BTMKX vs VFWPX
iShares MSCI EAFE Intl Idx K
Price$18.03
Change-$0.26 (-1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.86B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$137.92
Change-$1.89 (-1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.25B
BTMKX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTMKX vs. VFWPX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTMKX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 65.3B vs. BTMKX (11.9B). BTMKX (2.92) and VFWPX (2.83) have matching dividends . BTMKX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: BTMKX (14 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). BTMKX (0.05) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). VFWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 5.00 vs. BTMKX (4.00). BTMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: BTMKX (5000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). BTMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.11 vs. VFWPX (12.63). BTMKX return over 5 years is better than : 69.68 vs. VFWPX (44.28).
| BTMKX | VFWPX | BTMKX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.03 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.03 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.075 | 15.308 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 100000000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 65.3B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.92 | 2.83 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.11 | 12.63 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.14 | 34.78 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.68 | 44.28 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.41 | 42.92 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers