Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTMKX vs VFWPX
BTMKX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts BTMKX vs VFWPX
iShares MSCI EAFE Intl Idx K
Price$18.80
Change+$0.15 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.51B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$145.32
Change+$0.81 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.34B
BTMKX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTMKX vs. VFWPX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTMKX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 71.3B vs. BTMKX (12.5B). VFWPX (2.68) and BTMKX (2.57) have matching dividends . BTMKX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: BTMKX (14 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). BTMKX (0.05) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). VFWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 5.00 vs. BTMKX (4.00). BTMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: BTMKX (5000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). BTMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.14 vs. VFWPX (15.31). BTMKX return over 5 years is better than : 65.90 vs. VFWPX (40.10).
| BTMKX | VFWPX | BTMKX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.03 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.03 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.117 | 21.023 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 100000000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 71.3B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.57 | 2.68 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.14 | 15.31 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.65 | 47.08 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.90 | 40.10 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.90 | 68.81 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers