Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTMKX vs VFWPX
BTMKX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts BTMKX vs VFWPX
iShares MSCI EAFE Intl Idx K
Price$18.95
Change+$0.10 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.55B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$144.97
Change+$0.55 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.11B
BTMKX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTMKX vs. VFWPX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTMKX is a StrongBuy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68.1B vs. BTMKX (12.6B). VFWPX (2.79) and BTMKX (2.69) have matching dividends . BTMKX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: BTMKX (14 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). BTMKX (0.05) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). VFWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 5.00 vs. BTMKX (4.00). BTMKX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: BTMKX (5000000) vs VFWPX (100000000). BTMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.28 vs. VFWPX (16.96). BTMKX return over 5 years is better than : 66.20 vs. VFWPX (40.41).
| BTMKX | VFWPX | BTMKX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.03 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.03 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.100 | 21.408 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 100000000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 68.1B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.69 | 2.79 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.28 | 16.96 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.26 | 36.09 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.20 | 40.41 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.92 | 58.38 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers