BTQNF
Price
$43.20
Change
+$5.20 (+13.68%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
BWPC
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 10 closing price
Ad is loading...

BTQNF vs BWPC

Header iconBTQNF vs BWPC Comparison
Open Charts BTQNF vs BWPCBanner chart's image
BQE Water
Price$43.20
Change+$5.20 (+13.68%)
Volume$110
CapitalizationN/A
Blue Water Petroleum
Price$0.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.1K
CapitalizationN/A
BTQNF vs BWPC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BTQNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BWPC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTQNF vs. BWPC commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTQNF is a Buy and BWPC is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BTQNF: $43.20 vs. BWPC: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: BTQNF and BWPC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTQNF: 17% vs. BWPC: 95%
Market capitalization -- BTQNF: $38.05M vs. BWPC: $834.22K
BTQNF [@Environmental Services] is valued at $38.05M. BWPC’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $834.22K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTQNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBWPC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTQNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BWPC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTQNF is a better buy in the long-term than BWPC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTQNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BWPC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTQNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • BWPC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BTQNF and BWPC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BTQNF (@Environmental Services) experienced а +13.68% price change this week, while BWPC (@Environmental Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+0.60% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTQNF($38.1M) has a higher market cap than BWPC($834K). BTQNF YTD gains are higher at: 90.476 vs. BWPC (-81.618). BTQNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.69M vs. BWPC (-988.95K). BTQNF has more cash in the bank: 3.76M vs. BWPC (579). BTQNF has less debt than BWPC: BTQNF (517K) vs BWPC (601K). BTQNF has higher revenues than BWPC: BTQNF (9M) vs BWPC (0).
BTQNFBWPCBTQNF / BWPC
Capitalization38.1M834K4,568%
EBITDA3.69M-988.95K-373%
Gain YTD90.476-81.618-111%
P/E Ratio19.99N/A-
Revenue9M0-
Total Cash3.76M579648,705%
Total Debt517K601K86%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTQNF vs BWPC: Fundamental Ratings
BTQNF
BWPC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3232
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
490
SMR RATING
1..100
51100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5264
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
61100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BWPC's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as BTQNF (71). This means that BWPC’s stock grew similarly to BTQNF’s over the last 12 months.

BTQNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BWPC (90). This means that BTQNF’s stock grew significantly faster than BWPC’s over the last 12 months.

BTQNF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BWPC (100). This means that BTQNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BWPC’s over the last 12 months.

BTQNF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as BWPC (64). This means that BTQNF’s stock grew similarly to BWPC’s over the last 12 months.

BTQNF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BWPC (100). This means that BTQNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BWPC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTQNFBWPC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BTQNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BWPC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STVYX21.30N/A
N/A
SEI Tax-Managed Mgd Volatility Y (SIMT)
PRIUX19.95-0.06
-0.30%
T. Rowe Price International Stock I
BWLYX27.35-0.18
-0.65%
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value Y
JDPNX15.77-0.14
-0.88%
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value N
OVECX10.84-0.11
-1.00%
Sterling Capital Mid Value C

BTQNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTQNF and CHFFY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTQNF and CHFFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTQNF
1D Price
Change %
BTQNF100%
+13.68%
CHFFY - BTQNF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCN - BTQNF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
BWPC - BTQNF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QRHC - BTQNF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
ESGL - BTQNF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.54%
More

BWPC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BWPC and GFL have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BWPC and GFL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWPC
1D Price
Change %
BWPC100%
N/A
GFL - BWPC
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
AQMS - BWPC
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.63%
BTQNF - BWPC
4%
Poorly correlated
+13.68%
WCN - BWPC
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
CHFFF - BWPC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More