BTQNF
Price
$43.20
Change
+$5.20 (+13.68%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
CHFFY
Price
$4.26
Change
+$0.12 (+2.90%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
Ad is loading...

BTQNF vs CHFFY

Header iconBTQNF vs CHFFY Comparison
Open Charts BTQNF vs CHFFYBanner chart's image
BQE Water
Price$43.20
Change+$5.20 (+13.68%)
Volume$110
CapitalizationN/A
China Everbright Environment Group
Price$4.26
Change+$0.12 (+2.90%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
BTQNF vs CHFFY Comparison Chart
Loading...
BTQNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTQNF vs. CHFFY commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTQNF is a Buy and CHFFY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BTQNF: $43.20 vs. CHFFY: $4.26)
Brand notoriety: BTQNF and CHFFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTQNF: 17% vs. CHFFY: 100%
Market capitalization -- BTQNF: $38.05M vs. CHFFY: $2.44B
BTQNF [@Environmental Services] is valued at $38.05M. CHFFY’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $2.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTQNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCHFFY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BTQNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CHFFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHFFY is a better buy in the long-term than BTQNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTQNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BTQNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

BTQNF (@Environmental Services) experienced а +13.68% price change this week, while CHFFY (@Environmental Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+0.60% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CHFFY($2.44B) has a higher market cap than BTQNF($38.1M). BTQNF has higher P/E ratio than CHFFY: BTQNF (19.99) vs CHFFY (4.06). BTQNF YTD gains are higher at: 90.476 vs. CHFFY (62.627). CHFFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.8B vs. BTQNF (3.69M). CHFFY has higher revenues than BTQNF: CHFFY (37.3B) vs BTQNF (9M).
BTQNFCHFFYBTQNF / CHFFY
Capitalization38.1M2.44B2%
EBITDA3.69M12.8B0%
Gain YTD90.47662.627144%
P/E Ratio19.994.06492%
Revenue9M37.3B0%
Total Cash3.76MN/A-
Total Debt517KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTQNF vs CHFFY: Fundamental Ratings
BTQNF
CHFFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3240
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4100
SMR RATING
1..100
51100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6127
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a43

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CHFFY's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTQNF (71). This means that CHFFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTQNF’s over the last 12 months.

BTQNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CHFFY (100). This means that BTQNF’s stock grew significantly faster than CHFFY’s over the last 12 months.

BTQNF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHFFY (100). This means that BTQNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHFFY’s over the last 12 months.

CHFFY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BTQNF (52). This means that CHFFY’s stock grew similarly to BTQNF’s over the last 12 months.

CHFFY's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTQNF (61). This means that CHFFY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTQNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTQNFCHFFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BTQNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SVOAX16.48N/A
N/A
SEI US Managed Volatility F (SIMT)
BEQAX34.50-0.13
-0.38%
American Century Equity Growth A
FSSKX85.71-0.35
-0.41%
Fidelity Advisor Stock Sel All Cp K
SACEX9.34-0.05
-0.53%
Spirit of America Energy C
EMCCX58.47-0.41
-0.70%
Empiric Class C

BTQNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTQNF and CHFFY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTQNF and CHFFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTQNF
1D Price
Change %
BTQNF100%
+13.68%
CHFFY - BTQNF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCN - BTQNF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
BWPC - BTQNF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QRHC - BTQNF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
ESGL - BTQNF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.54%
More

CHFFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHFFY and TSPCF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHFFY and TSPCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHFFY
1D Price
Change %
CHFFY100%
N/A
TSPCF - CHFFY
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.26%
CWSFF - CHFFY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VEOEF - CHFFY
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.48%
BTQNF - CHFFY
9%
Poorly correlated
+13.68%
GFL - CHFFY
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
More