BTQNF
Price
$39.08
Change
+$0.83 (+2.17%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
38.05M
CWSFF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
30.9M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTQNF vs CWSFF

Header iconBTQNF vs CWSFF Comparison
Open Charts BTQNF vs CWSFFBanner chart's image
BQE Water
Price$39.08
Change+$0.83 (+2.17%)
Volume$350
Capitalization38.05M
CIELO WASTE SOLUTIONS
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$366
Capitalization30.9M
BTQNF vs CWSFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTQNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CWSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTQNF vs. CWSFF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTQNF is a Buy and CWSFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BTQNF: $39.08 vs. CWSFF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: BTQNF and CWSFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTQNF: 139% vs. CWSFF: 3%
Market capitalization -- BTQNF: $38.05M vs. CWSFF: $30.9M
BTQNF [@Environmental Services] is valued at $38.05M. CWSFF’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $30.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTQNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCWSFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTQNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CWSFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTQNF is a better buy in the long-term than CWSFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTQNF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CWSFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTQNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CWSFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTQNF is a better buy in the short-term than CWSFF.

Price Growth

BTQNF (@Environmental Services) experienced а +2.17% price change this week, while CWSFF (@Environmental Services) price change was -14.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.86%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (-1.64% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTQNF($38.1M) has a higher market cap than CWSFF($30.9M). BTQNF YTD gains are higher at: -9.537 vs. CWSFF (-59.651). BTQNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.69M vs. CWSFF (-33.13M). BTQNF has more cash in the bank: 3.76M vs. CWSFF (1.33M). BTQNF has less debt than CWSFF: BTQNF (517K) vs CWSFF (10M). BTQNF has higher revenues than CWSFF: BTQNF (9M) vs CWSFF (0).
BTQNFCWSFFBTQNF / CWSFF
Capitalization38.1M30.9M123%
EBITDA3.69M-33.13M-11%
Gain YTD-9.537-59.65116%
P/E Ratio19.99N/A-
Revenue9M0-
Total Cash3.76M1.33M282%
Total Debt517K10M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTQNF vs CWSFF: Fundamental Ratings
BTQNF
CWSFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8784
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16100
SMR RATING
1..100
2599
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4897
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTQNF's Valuation (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWSFF (97). This means that BTQNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWSFF’s over the last 12 months.

BTQNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CWSFF (100). This means that BTQNF’s stock grew significantly faster than CWSFF’s over the last 12 months.

BTQNF's SMR Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CWSFF (99). This means that BTQNF’s stock grew significantly faster than CWSFF’s over the last 12 months.

BTQNF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWSFF (97). This means that BTQNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWSFF’s over the last 12 months.

BTQNF's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as CWSFF (100). This means that BTQNF’s stock grew similarly to CWSFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTQNFCWSFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTQNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CWSFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SVNLY6.640.07
+0.99%
Svenska Handelsbanken AB PUBL
PSTO0.02N/A
N/A
Powerstorm Holdings, Inc.
AGMJF11.74N/A
N/A
Algoma Central Corp.
QNTQF6.90N/A
N/A
Qinetiq Group Plc.
ATCUF0.41N/A
N/A
ALTA COPPER CORP.

BTQNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTQNF and CHFFY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTQNF and CHFFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTQNF
1D Price
Change %
BTQNF100%
N/A
CHFFY - BTQNF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCN - BTQNF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
BWPC - BTQNF
4%
Poorly correlated
-7.00%
QRHC - BTQNF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.74%
ESGL - BTQNF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
More

CWSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CWSFF and CHFFY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWSFF and CHFFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWSFF
1D Price
Change %
CWSFF100%
-14.00%
CHFFY - CWSFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESGL - CWSFF
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
BTQNF - CWSFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WCN - CWSFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
CHFFF - CWSFF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More