It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BTQNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQRHC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BTQNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QRHC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BTQNF (@Environmental Services) experienced а +13.68% price change this week, while QRHC (@Environmental Services) price change was -1.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.87%.
QRHC is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.
Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
BTQNF | QRHC | BTQNF / QRHC | |
Capitalization | 38.1M | 171M | 22% |
EBITDA | 3.69M | 12.8M | 29% |
Gain YTD | 90.476 | -6.276 | -1,442% |
P/E Ratio | 19.99 | 62.50 | 32% |
Revenue | 9M | 288M | 3% |
Total Cash | 3.76M | 324K | 1,159% |
Total Debt | 517K | 67.6M | 1% |
BTQNF | QRHC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 77 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BTQNF's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as QRHC (90) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that BTQNF’s stock grew similarly to QRHC’s over the last 12 months.
BTQNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as QRHC (30) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that BTQNF’s stock grew similarly to QRHC’s over the last 12 months.
BTQNF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QRHC (92) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that BTQNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QRHC’s over the last 12 months.
BTQNF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as QRHC (77) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that BTQNF’s stock grew similarly to QRHC’s over the last 12 months.
QRHC's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Environmental Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTQNF (61) in the null industry. This means that QRHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTQNF’s over the last 12 months.
BTQNF | QRHC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago45% | 2 days ago86% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago37% | 2 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago45% | 2 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago46% | 2 days ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago43% | 2 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago39% | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago75% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago17% | 2 days ago81% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
HYG | 79.39 | -0.17 | -0.21% |
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corp Bd ETF | |||
FVAL | 63.07 | -0.24 | -0.39% |
Fidelity Value Factor ETF | |||
PIN | 28.99 | -0.25 | -0.85% |
Invesco India ETF | |||
CAFG | 26.57 | -0.25 | -0.94% |
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Gr Ldrs ETF | |||
DRN | 11.00 | -0.19 | -1.70% |
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3X ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BTQNF and CHFFY have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTQNF and CHFFY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BTQNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BTQNF | 100% | +13.68% | ||
CHFFY - BTQNF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
WCN - BTQNF | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.02% | ||
BWPC - BTQNF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
QRHC - BTQNF | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.18% | ||
ESGL - BTQNF | 1% Poorly correlated | -2.54% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that QRHC and PESI have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QRHC and PESI's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QRHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QRHC | 100% | +1.18% | ||
PESI - QRHC | 30% Poorly correlated | -3.97% | ||
NVRI - QRHC | 27% Poorly correlated | -2.63% | ||
LNZA - QRHC | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.00% | ||
CLH - QRHC | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.20% | ||
CWST - QRHC | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
More |