BTRYF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Updated
Jul 1 closing price
Capitalization
7.13M
EMHLF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
121.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTRYF vs EMHLF

Header iconBTRYF vs EMHLF Comparison
Open Charts BTRYF vs EMHLFBanner chart's image
WARATAH MINERALS
Price$0.19
Change-$0.01 (-5.00%)
Volume$148
Capitalization7.13M
European Metals Holdings
Price$0.11
Change-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Volume$30.55K
Capitalization121.16M
BTRYF vs EMHLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTRYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTRYF vs. EMHLF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTRYF is a Hold and EMHLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (BTRYF: $0.19 vs. EMHLF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: BTRYF and EMHLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTRYF: 1% vs. EMHLF: 163%
Market capitalization -- BTRYF: $7.13M vs. EMHLF: $121.16M
BTRYF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $7.13M. EMHLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $121.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTRYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEMHLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTRYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EMHLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTRYF is a better buy in the long-term than EMHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTRYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EMHLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTRYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • EMHLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BTRYF and EMHLF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BTRYF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -5.05% price change this week, while EMHLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -5.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMHLF($121M) has a higher market cap than BTRYF($7.13M). BTRYF YTD gains are higher at: 107.446 vs. EMHLF (27.315). BTRYF (-7.22M) and EMHLF (-7.27M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . EMHLF has more cash in the bank: 17.5M vs. BTRYF (3.91M). EMHLF has less debt than BTRYF: EMHLF (64K) vs BTRYF (196K).
BTRYFEMHLFBTRYF / EMHLF
Capitalization7.13M121M6%
EBITDA-7.22M-7.27M99%
Gain YTD107.44627.315393%
P/E RatioN/A28.82-
RevenueN/A1.1M-
Total Cash3.91M17.5M22%
Total Debt196K64K306%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTRYFEMHLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTRYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EMHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CICHF1.110.16
+16.84%
China Construction Bank Corp.
ALPKF0.57N/A
N/A
Alpek SAB DE CV
GIPIF2.33N/A
N/A
GREEN IMPACT PARTNERS INC
DUKR0.18N/A
-1.37%
Duke Robotics Corp.
ARKAY74.38-3.51
-4.51%
Arkema

BTRYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTRYF and SNLGF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTRYF and SNLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTRYF
1D Price
Change %
BTRYF100%
N/A
SNLGF - BTRYF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
YLLXF - BTRYF
17%
Poorly correlated
-3.14%
EMHLF - BTRYF
14%
Poorly correlated
-5.01%
ELECF - BTRYF
13%
Poorly correlated
-8.21%
WTRNF - BTRYF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

EMHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMHLF and BTRYF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMHLF and BTRYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMHLF
1D Price
Change %
EMHLF100%
-5.01%
BTRYF - EMHLF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YLLXF - EMHLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.14%
SMRVF - EMHLF
4%
Poorly correlated
+13.49%
MP - EMHLF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
ASMMF - EMHLF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
More