BTSBF
Price
$14.29
Change
-$2.92 (-16.97%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.49B
CDRO
Price
$8.03
Change
-$0.34 (-4.06%)
Updated
Aug 7, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
315.73M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTSBF vs CDRO

Header iconBTSBF vs CDRO Comparison
Open Charts BTSBF vs CDROBanner chart's image
Betsson AB
Price$14.29
Change-$2.92 (-16.97%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.49B
Codere Online Luxembourg SA
Price$8.03
Change-$0.34 (-4.06%)
Volume$800
Capitalization315.73M
BTSBF vs CDRO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTSBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTSBF vs. CDRO commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTSBF is a Hold and CDRO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BTSBF: $14.29 vs. CDRO: $8.37)
Brand notoriety: BTSBF and CDRO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTSBF: 32% vs. CDRO: 35%
Market capitalization -- BTSBF: $1.49B vs. CDRO: $315.73M
BTSBF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $1.49B. CDRO’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $315.73M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTSBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCDRO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTSBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CDRO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTSBF is a better buy in the long-term than CDRO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTSBF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDRO’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTSBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CDRO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTSBF is a better buy in the short-term than CDRO.

Price Growth

BTSBF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -16.97% price change this week, while CDRO (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -0.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-2.20% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTSBF($1.49B) has a higher market cap than CDRO($316M). CDRO YTD gains are higher at: 29.767 vs. BTSBF (19.183). BTSBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 243M vs. CDRO (-65.77M). BTSBF has more cash in the bank: 240M vs. CDRO (98.8M). CDRO has less debt than BTSBF: CDRO (2.98M) vs BTSBF (186M). BTSBF has higher revenues than CDRO: BTSBF (917M) vs CDRO (80.3M).
BTSBFCDROBTSBF / CDRO
Capitalization1.49B316M472%
EBITDA243M-65.77M-369%
Gain YTD19.18329.76764%
P/E Ratio7.99N/A-
Revenue917M80.3M1,142%
Total Cash240M98.8M243%
Total Debt186M2.98M6,233%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTSBFCDRO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTSBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDRO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HBLCX14.49N/A
N/A
Hartford Balanced Income C
LOGSX20.21N/A
N/A
Live Oak Health Sciences
MERAX14.75N/A
N/A
Madison Mid Cap A
GOODX50.56N/A
N/A
GoodHaven
OMCIX48.18N/A
N/A
Oberweis Micro Cap Institutional

BTSBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTSBF and TBTC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTSBF and TBTC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTSBF
1D Price
Change %
BTSBF100%
N/A
TBTC - BTSBF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
GAMB - BTSBF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
CDRO - BTSBF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
JPOTF - BTSBF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SEGG - BTSBF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
More

CDRO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDRO has been loosely correlated with FLUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDRO jumps, then FLUT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDRO
1D Price
Change %
CDRO100%
-0.24%
FLUT - CDRO
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
MGM - CDRO
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
PENN - CDRO
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
EVRI - CDRO
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CZR - CDRO
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
More