BTSBF
Price
$16.00
Change
+$1.71 (+11.97%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
2.06B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GAMB
Price
$4.78
Change
-$0.07 (-1.44%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
168.1M
120 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTSBF vs GAMB

Header iconBTSBF vs GAMB Comparison
Open Charts BTSBF vs GAMBBanner chart's image
Betsson AB
Price$16.00
Change+$1.71 (+11.97%)
Volume$110
Capitalization2.06B
Gambling.com Group
Price$4.78
Change-$0.07 (-1.44%)
Volume$15.22K
Capitalization168.1M
BTSBF vs GAMB Comparison Chart in %
BTSBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GAMB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTSBF vs. GAMB commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTSBF is a Hold and GAMB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BTSBF: $16.00 vs. GAMB: $4.84)
Brand notoriety: BTSBF and GAMB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTSBF: 45% vs. GAMB: 128%
Market capitalization -- BTSBF: $2.02B vs. GAMB: $168.1M
BTSBF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $2.02B. GAMB’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $168.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $35.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $4.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTSBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGAMB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BTSBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GAMB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTSBF is a better buy in the long-term than GAMB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTSBF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GAMB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTSBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • GAMB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTSBF is a better buy in the short-term than GAMB.

Price Growth

BTSBF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GAMB (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -29.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -4.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -14.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

GAMB is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-4.81% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTSBF($2.06B) has a higher market cap than GAMB($168M). GAMB has higher P/E ratio than BTSBF: GAMB (95.60) vs BTSBF (9.84). BTSBF YTD gains are higher at: 33.445 vs. GAMB (-65.589). BTSBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 327M vs. GAMB (33.5M). BTSBF has more cash in the bank: 394M vs. GAMB (18.7M). GAMB has less debt than BTSBF: GAMB (95.6M) vs BTSBF (180M). BTSBF has higher revenues than GAMB: BTSBF (1.2B) vs GAMB (148M).
BTSBFGAMBBTSBF / GAMB
Capitalization2.06B168M1,226%
EBITDA327M33.5M976%
Gain YTD33.445-65.589-51%
P/E Ratio9.8495.6010%
Revenue1.2B148M811%
Total Cash394M18.7M2,107%
Total Debt180M95.6M188%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTSBFGAMB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTSBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GAMB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EJPRF25.03N/A
N/A
East Japan Railway Co.
WPNDF0.08N/A
N/A
Wishpond Technologies Ltd.
CSWYY18.94N/A
N/A
China Shineway Pharmaceutical Group Ltd.
HUYTF0.01N/A
N/A
HUAYI TENCENT ENTMT CO LTD.
UPCHY105.32-11.64
-9.95%
Uni-President China Holdings Ltd.

BTSBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTSBF and TBTC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTSBF and TBTC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTSBF
1D Price
Change %
BTSBF100%
N/A
TBTC - BTSBF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
GAMB - BTSBF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
CDRO - BTSBF
5%
Poorly correlated
+10.56%
JPOTF - BTSBF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
SEGG - BTSBF
2%
Poorly correlated
-8.09%
More