BTSBF vs GAMB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTSBF is a Hold and GAMB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BTSBF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGAMB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BTSBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- GAMB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BTSBF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GAMB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BTSBF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
- GAMB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
BTSBF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GAMB (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +2.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +58.77%.
Reported Earning Dates
GAMB is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (+0.37% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
| BTSBF | GAMB | BTSBF / GAMB | |
| Capitalization | 1.49B | 346M | 431% |
| EBITDA | 243M | 23.1M | 1,052% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 7.99 | 19.77 | 40% |
| Revenue | 917M | 109M | 841% |
| Total Cash | 240M | 25.4M | 945% |
| Total Debt | 186M | 1.72M | 10,795% |
| BTSBF | GAMB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 23% | 12 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 21% | 12 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 25 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 26% | 12 days ago 74% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CLCRX | 23.20 | 0.17 | +0.74% |
| Columbia Select Large Cap Equity Inst2 | |||
| AIEAX | 14.94 | 0.10 | +0.67% |
| American Beacon International Eq A | |||
| HHHYX | 16.88 | 0.07 | +0.42% |
| Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq Y | |||
| WGGSX | 12.58 | 0.04 | +0.32% |
| Wasatch Global Select Institutional | |||
| DBICX | 9.74 | 0.01 | +0.10% |
| DWS Global Macro C | |||
BTSBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BTSBF and TBTC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTSBF and TBTC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BTSBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTSBF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TBTC - BTSBF | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.99% | ||
| GAMB - BTSBF | 5% Poorly correlated | +2.25% | ||
| CDRO - BTSBF | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.27% | ||
| JPOTF - BTSBF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LTRY - BTSBF | 2% Poorly correlated | -3.68% | ||
More | ||||
GAMB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GAMB has been loosely correlated with CZR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GAMB jumps, then CZR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GAMB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GAMB | 100% | +2.25% | ||
| CZR - GAMB | 36% Loosely correlated | +2.19% | ||
| MCRI - GAMB | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
| GEBHF - GAMB | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WYNN - GAMB | 32% Poorly correlated | +2.63% | ||
| RSI - GAMB | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||