BTSGU vs CWB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTSGU is a Hold and CWB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BTSGU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- BTSGU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
BTSGU (@Packaged Software) experienced а -2.12% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.45%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-4.09% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CWB | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% |
BTSGU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTSGU has been closely correlated with BTSG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BTSGU jumps, then BTSG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BTSGU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTSGU | 100% | -1.77% | ||
| BTSG - BTSGU | 92% Closely correlated | -2.20% | ||
| TEAM - BTSGU | 41% Loosely correlated | -11.44% | ||
| SDGR - BTSGU | 36% Loosely correlated | -5.08% | ||
| PCOR - BTSGU | 33% Loosely correlated | -10.02% | ||
| ALKT - BTSGU | 33% Poorly correlated | -6.50% | ||
More | ||||
CWB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWB has been loosely correlated with GCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWB jumps, then GCI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWB | 100% | -3.02% | ||
| GCI - CWB | 51% Loosely correlated | -8.00% | ||
| TTWO - CWB | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| BTSGU - CWB | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| SO - CWB | 18% Poorly correlated | +1.38% |