BTSGU
Price
$77.94
Change
+$2.04 (+2.69%)
Updated
Aug 13, 04:56 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
SANG
Price
$5.83
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 13, 02:11 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
197.32M
42 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTSGU vs SANG

Header iconBTSGU vs SANG Comparison
Open Charts BTSGU vs SANGBanner chart's image
BrightSpring Health Services
Price$77.94
Change+$2.04 (+2.69%)
Volume$140
CapitalizationN/A
Sangoma Technologies
Price$5.83
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization197.32M
BTSGU vs SANG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTSGU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTSGU vs. SANG commentary
Aug 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTSGU is a Buy and SANG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BTSGU: $75.90 vs. SANG: $5.82)
Brand notoriety: BTSGU and SANG are both not notable
BTSGU represents the Services to the Health Industry, while SANG is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTSGU: 2% vs. SANG: 69%
Market capitalization -- BTSGU: $0 vs. SANG: $197.32M
BTSGU [@Services to the Health Industry] is valued at $0. SANG’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $197.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $45.26B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.93T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.12B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTSGU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSANG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTSGU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTSGU is a better buy in the long-term than SANG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTSGU’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SANG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTSGU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SANG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTSGU is a better buy in the short-term than SANG.

Price Growth

BTSGU (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а +7.51% price change this week, while SANG (@Computer Communications) price change was +1.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.65%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +3.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

SANG is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Services to the Health Industry (+1.95% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

@Computer Communications (+3.09% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTSGU YTD gains are higher at: 25.927 vs. SANG (-18.417). BTSGU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 472M vs. SANG (43.1M). BTSGU has more cash in the bank: 70.1M vs. SANG (16.7M). SANG has less debt than BTSGU: SANG (62.3M) vs BTSGU (2.71B). BTSGU has higher revenues than SANG: BTSGU (12.6B) vs SANG (238M).
BTSGUSANGBTSGU / SANG
CapitalizationN/A197M-
EBITDA472M43.1M1,095%
Gain YTD25.927-18.417-141%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue12.6B238M5,294%
Total Cash70.1M16.7M420%
Total Debt2.71B62.3M4,353%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SANG: Fundamental Ratings
SANG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTSGUSANG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTSGU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CASH75.311.55
+2.10%
Pathward Financial
PVL1.850.02
+0.82%
Permianville Royalty Trust
XOMAO25.350.18
+0.71%
XOMA Corp
BBCP7.05-0.01
-0.14%
Concrete Pumping Holdings
NICE142.34-2.31
-1.60%
NICE Ltd

BTSGU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTSGU has been closely correlated with BTSG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BTSGU jumps, then BTSG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTSGU
1D Price
Change %
BTSGU100%
+3.22%
BTSG - BTSGU
91%
Closely correlated
+5.13%
AVPT - BTSGU
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
DUOL - BTSGU
40%
Loosely correlated
-5.19%
ALKT - BTSGU
39%
Loosely correlated
+5.23%
PAR - BTSGU
39%
Loosely correlated
+5.03%
More

SANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SANG and S have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SANG and S's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SANG
1D Price
Change %
SANG100%
+0.26%
S - SANG
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.10%
CORZ - SANG
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.99%
BTSGU - SANG
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.22%
LYFT - SANG
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.12%
BFRG - SANG
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
More