BTSGU
Price
$65.00
Change
+$4.02 (+6.59%)
Updated
Apr 9, 03:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
N/A
SANG
Price
$4.32
Change
+$0.22 (+5.37%)
Updated
Apr 9, 02:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
160.31M
29 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BTSGU vs SANG

Header iconBTSGU vs SANG Comparison
Open Charts BTSGU vs SANGBanner chart's image
BrightSpring Health Services
Price$65.00
Change+$4.02 (+6.59%)
Volume$800
CapitalizationN/A
Sangoma Technologies
Price$4.32
Change+$0.22 (+5.37%)
Volume$200
Capitalization160.31M
BTSGU vs SANG Comparison Chart
Loading...
SANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTSGU vs. SANG commentary
Apr 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTSGU is a Buy and SANG is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 10, 2025
Stock price -- (BTSGU: $60.98 vs. SANG: $4.10)
Brand notoriety: BTSGU and SANG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTSGU: 8% vs. SANG: 4%
Market capitalization -- BTSGU: $0 vs. SANG: $160.31M
BTSGU [@Packaged Software] is valued at $0. SANG’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $160.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTSGU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSANG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTSGU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTSGU is a better buy in the long-term than SANG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SANG’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SANG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

BTSGU (@Packaged Software) experienced а -6.94% price change this week, while SANG (@Packaged Software) price change was -7.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

SANG is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-4.37% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTSGU YTD gains are higher at: -1.323 vs. SANG (-42.577). BTSGU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 350M vs. SANG (17.5M). BTSGU has more cash in the bank: 13.1M vs. SANG (10.6M). SANG has less debt than BTSGU: SANG (105M) vs BTSGU (3.67B). BTSGU has higher revenues than SANG: BTSGU (8.83B) vs SANG (252M).
BTSGUSANGBTSGU / SANG
CapitalizationN/A160M-
EBITDA350M17.5M2,000%
Gain YTD-1.323-42.5773%
P/E RatioN/A909.09-
Revenue8.83B252M3,502%
Total Cash13.1M10.6M124%
Total Debt3.67B105M3,496%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SANG: Fundamental Ratings
SANG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SANG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYHIX115.74N/A
N/A
Rydex Health Care Inv
SVOAX13.21N/A
N/A
SEI US Managed Volatility F (SIMT)
BHSRX57.32N/A
N/A
BlackRock Health Sciences Opps R
COHOX11.98N/A
N/A
Coho Relative Value Equity
JIGAX67.99N/A
N/A
JPMorgan U.S. GARP Equity A

BTSGU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTSGU has been closely correlated with BTSG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BTSGU jumps, then BTSG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTSGU
1D Price
Change %
BTSGU100%
-4.04%
BTSG - BTSGU
92%
Closely correlated
-5.15%
TEAM - BTSGU
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
SDGR - BTSGU
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.32%
PCOR - BTSGU
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.18%
DSGX - BTSGU
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.95%
More

SANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SANG and BTSGU have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SANG and BTSGU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SANG
1D Price
Change %
SANG100%
-6.60%
BTSGU - SANG
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.04%
LYFT - SANG
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.78%
OCFT - SANG
27%
Poorly correlated
-6.68%
WDAY - SANG
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.25%
TOST - SANG
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
More