Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUFEX vs RGABX
BUFEX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts BUFEX vs RGABX
Buffalo Blue Chip Growth
Price$61.79
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets169.79M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$78.40
Change+$0.05 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
BUFEX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUFEX vs. RGABX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUFEX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. BUFEX (170M). BUFEX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . BUFEX was incepted earlier than RGABX: BUFEX (30 years) vs RGABX (23 years). RGABX (1.39) is less costly to investors than BUFEX (0.89). BUFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RGABX (25.00). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than BUFEX: RGABX (250) vs BUFEX (2500). BUFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.01 vs. RGABX (15.67). BUFEX return over 5 years is better than : 50.41 vs. RGABX (40.02).
| BUFEX | RGABX | BUFEX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.39 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.39 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.653 | 18.037 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.01 | 15.67 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 84.62 | 57.30 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.41 | 40.02 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 152.09 | 88.24 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement