Ad is loading...
BUFOX vs WCMLX
BUFOX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BUFOX vs WCMLX
Buffalo Early Stage Growth Fd
Price$15.02
Change+$0.10 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.05M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.80
Change+$0.13 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.14M
BUFOX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUFOX vs. WCMLX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUFOX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUFOX has more cash in the bank: 60M vs. WCMLX (42.1M). BUFOX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BUFOX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BUFOX (21 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than BUFOX (1.45). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. BUFOX (20.00). BUFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: BUFOX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). BUFOX (-6.70) and WCMLX (-6.86) have marching annual gain over last year. WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 21.31 vs. BUFOX (-3.22).
| BUFOX | WCMLX | BUFOX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.99 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.86 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.037 | -9.253 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 60M | 42.1M | 143% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.70 | -6.86 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.45 | 15.89 | -34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.22 | 21.31 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...