Ad is loading...
BUFOX vs WCMLX
BUFOX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BUFOX vs WCMLX
Buffalo Early Stage Growth Fd
Price$13.38
Change-$0.31 (-2.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.48M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$10.02
Change-$0.27 (-2.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.82M
BUFOX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUFOX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUFOX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUFOX has more cash in the bank: 55.5M vs. WCMLX (36.8M). BUFOX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BUFOX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BUFOX (21 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than BUFOX (1.45). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. BUFOX (20.00). BUFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: BUFOX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). BUFOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.85 vs. WCMLX (-20.36). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 20.63 vs. BUFOX (1.86).
| BUFOX | WCMLX | BUFOX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.99 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.86 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.431 | -19.984 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 55.5M | 36.8M | 151% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.85 | -20.36 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | -19.23 | -12.72 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.86 | 20.63 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | -25.40 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers