Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUFOX vs WCMLX
BUFOX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BUFOX vs WCMLX
Buffalo Early Stage Growth Fd
Price$16.70
Change+$0.06 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.27M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change+$0.06 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.37M
BUFOX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUFOX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUFOX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUFOX has more cash in the bank: 66.3M vs. WCMLX (44.4M). BUFOX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BUFOX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BUFOX (22 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BUFOX (1.45). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. BUFOX (18.00). BUFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: BUFOX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.57 vs. BUFOX (-5.17). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 4.15 vs. BUFOX (-23.29).
| BUFOX | WCMLX | BUFOX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.99 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.79 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.724 | 9.331 | 8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 66.3M | 44.4M | 149% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.17 | 0.57 | -903% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.07 | 30.91 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.29 | 4.15 | -561% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement