Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUFOX vs WCMLX
BUFOX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BUFOX vs WCMLX
Buffalo Early Stage Growth Fd
Price$17.63
Change+$0.06 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets70.76M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.69
Change+$0.08 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.77M
BUFOX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUFOX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUFOX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUFOX has more cash in the bank: 70.8M vs. WCMLX (44.8M). BUFOX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BUFOX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BUFOX (21 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BUFOX (1.45). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. BUFOX (18.00). BUFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: BUFOX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). BUFOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.36 vs. WCMLX (4.77). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 17.13 vs. BUFOX (-8.68).
| BUFOX | WCMLX | BUFOX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.99 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.79 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.971 | 5.832 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 70.8M | 44.8M | 158% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.36 | 4.77 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.41 | 22.83 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.68 | 17.13 | -51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement