Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUFSX vs WCMLX
BUFSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BUFSX vs WCMLX
Buffalo Small Cap Growth
Price$14.51
Change-$0.05 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets490.66M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.18
Change-$0.08 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.37M
BUFSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUFSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUFSX is a StrongBuy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUFSX has more cash in the bank: 491M vs. WCMLX (44.4M). BUFSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BUFSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BUFSX (27 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BUFSX (0.97). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. BUFSX (20.00). BUFSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: BUFSX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.76 vs. BUFSX (-0.41). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 18.18 vs. BUFSX (-15.35).
| BUFSX | WCMLX | BUFSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.99 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 1.79 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.151 | 3.110 | -69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 491M | 44.4M | 1,106% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.41 | 3.76 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.02 | 10.04 | -80% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.35 | 18.18 | -84% |
| Returns for 10 years | -55.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers