Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUG vs CIBR
BUG vs CIBR Comparison
Open Charts BUG vs CIBR
Global X Cybersecurity ETF
Price$36.23
Change+$0.45 (+1.26%)
Volume$426
Net Assets1.11B
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$73.52
Change+$0.23 (+0.31%)
Volume$100
Net Assets9.52B
BUG vs CIBR Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUG vs. CIBR commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUG is a Buy and CIBR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 9.52B vs. BUG (1.11B). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than BUG: CIBR (15.516) vs BUG (11.499). BUG was incepted earlier than CIBR: BUG (6 years) vs CIBR (10 years). BUG (0.51) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.59). CIBR has a higher turnover BUG (23.91) vs BUG (23.91).
| BUG | CIBR | BUG / CIBR | |
| Gain YTD | 11.499 | 15.516 | 74% |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 9.52B | 12% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.59 | 86% |
| Turnover | 23.91 | 39.00 | 61% |
| Yield | 0.09 | 0.23 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUG | CIBR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 84% | 9 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUG has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUG jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUG | 100% | +0.39% | ||
| ZS - BUG | 80% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| S - BUG | 69% Closely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| RPD - BUG | 68% Closely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| CYBR - BUG | 67% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| VRNS - BUG | 67% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
More | ||||
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | +0.48% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 74% Closely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 74% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 72% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 71% Closely correlated | +3.17% | ||
| S - CIBR | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
More | ||||