BUGDF
Price
$7.91
Change
+$0.30 (+3.94%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
5.01B
CCEL
Price
$5.04
Change
-$0.04 (-0.79%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
61.83M
61 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BUGDF vs CCEL

Header iconBUGDF vs CCEL Comparison
Open Charts BUGDF vs CCELBanner chart's image
Bumrungrad Hospital Public
Price$7.91
Change+$0.30 (+3.94%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization5.01B
Cryo-Cell International
Price$5.04
Change-$0.04 (-0.79%)
Volume$6.67K
Capitalization61.83M
BUGDF vs CCEL Comparison Chart
Loading...
CCEL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUGDF vs. CCEL commentary
May 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUGDF is a Hold and CCEL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 12, 2025
Stock price -- (BUGDF: $7.91 vs. CCEL: $5.05)
Brand notoriety: BUGDF and CCEL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUGDF: 100% vs. CCEL: 50%
Market capitalization -- BUGDF: $5.01B vs. CCEL: $61.83M
BUGDF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $5.01B. CCEL’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $61.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUGDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCCEL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BUGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CCEL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BUGDF is a better buy in the long-term than CCEL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCEL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CCEL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BUGDF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CCEL (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +4.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUGDF is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

CCEL is expected to report earnings on Jul 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+0.83% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUGDF($5.01B) has a higher market cap than CCEL($61.8M). BUGDF has higher P/E ratio than CCEL: BUGDF (43.10) vs CCEL (16.37). BUGDF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. CCEL (-29.688). BUGDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.17B vs. CCEL (6.98M). BUGDF has more cash in the bank: 9.85B vs. CCEL (1.21M). CCEL has less debt than BUGDF: CCEL (12.5M) vs BUGDF (58M). BUGDF has higher revenues than CCEL: BUGDF (20.7B) vs CCEL (31.2M).
BUGDFCCELBUGDF / CCEL
Capitalization5.01B61.8M8,107%
EBITDA7.17B6.98M102,722%
Gain YTD0.000-29.688-
P/E Ratio43.1016.37263%
Revenue20.7B31.2M66,346%
Total Cash9.85B1.21M815,659%
Total Debt58M12.5M464%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUGDF vs CCEL: Fundamental Ratings
BUGDF
CCEL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5056
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1100
SMR RATING
1..100
3512
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5088
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
364
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CCEL's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BUGDF (78). This means that CCEL’s stock grew somewhat faster than BUGDF’s over the last 12 months.

BUGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CCEL (100). This means that BUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than CCEL’s over the last 12 months.

CCEL's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as BUGDF (35). This means that CCEL’s stock grew similarly to BUGDF’s over the last 12 months.

BUGDF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCEL (88). This means that BUGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CCEL’s over the last 12 months.

CCEL's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as BUGDF (36). This means that CCEL’s stock grew similarly to BUGDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCEL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CCEL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRCGX21.290.20
+0.95%
Perritt MicroCap Opportunities Investor
MIOLX27.910.11
+0.40%
Morgan Stanley Inst International Opp L
EDIIX10.700.03
+0.28%
Eaton Vance Global Income Builder I
EAASX33.37-0.07
-0.21%
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap A
TSNRX17.91-0.05
-0.28%
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Gr R6

BUGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BUGDF and VLXC have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BUGDF and VLXC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUGDF
1D Price
Change %
BUGDF100%
N/A
VLXC - BUGDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EXETF - BUGDF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
CHHHF - BUGDF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCEL - BUGDF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
BDUUY - BUGDF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CCEL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCEL and NWKHY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCEL and NWKHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCEL
1D Price
Change %
CCEL100%
-0.98%
NWKHY - CCEL
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHC - CCEL
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.21%
CMPS - CCEL
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
TOI - CCEL
13%
Poorly correlated
-4.11%
BDUUY - CCEL
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More