BUHPF
Price
$4.85
Change
+$0.10 (+2.11%)
Updated
Mar 18 closing price
Capitalization
5.01B
GBCS
Price
$2.25
Change
+$0.05 (+2.27%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
15.34M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BUHPF vs GBCS

Header iconBUHPF vs GBCS Comparison
Open Charts BUHPF vs GBCSBanner chart's image
Bumrungrad Hospital Public
Price$4.85
Change+$0.10 (+2.11%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization5.01B
Selectis Health
Price$2.25
Change+$0.05 (+2.27%)
Volume$691
Capitalization15.34M
BUHPF vs GBCS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GBCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUHPF vs. GBCS commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUHPF is a Hold and GBCS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BUHPF: $4.85 vs. GBCS: $2.25)
Brand notoriety: BUHPF and GBCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUHPF: 100% vs. GBCS: 95%
Market capitalization -- BUHPF: $5.01B vs. GBCS: $15.34M
BUHPF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $5.01B. GBCS’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $15.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUHPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGBCS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BUHPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GBCS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GBCS is a better buy in the long-term than BUHPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GBCS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GBCS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BUHPF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GBCS (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +25.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +2.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+2.39% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUHPF($5.01B) has a higher market cap than GBCS($15.3M). BUHPF has higher P/E ratio than GBCS: BUHPF (38.46) vs GBCS (17.18). GBCS YTD gains are higher at: 100.893 vs. BUHPF (-30.014). BUHPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.17B vs. GBCS (3.23M). BUHPF has more cash in the bank: 9.85B vs. GBCS (2.98M). GBCS has less debt than BUHPF: GBCS (37.8M) vs BUHPF (58M). BUHPF has higher revenues than GBCS: BUHPF (20.7B) vs GBCS (35M).
BUHPFGBCSBUHPF / GBCS
Capitalization5.01B15.3M32,745%
EBITDA7.17B3.23M221,745%
Gain YTD-30.014100.893-30%
P/E Ratio38.4617.18224%
Revenue20.7B35M59,143%
Total Cash9.85B2.98M329,926%
Total Debt58M37.8M153%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUHPF vs GBCS: Fundamental Ratings
BUHPF
GBCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4732
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6591
SMR RATING
1..100
35100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7937
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9219
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
26n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BUHPF's Valuation (89) in the null industry is in the same range as GBCS (90). This means that BUHPF’s stock grew similarly to GBCS’s over the last 12 months.

BUHPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as GBCS (91). This means that BUHPF’s stock grew similarly to GBCS’s over the last 12 months.

BUHPF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GBCS (100). This means that BUHPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GBCS’s over the last 12 months.

GBCS's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BUHPF (79). This means that GBCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BUHPF’s over the last 12 months.

GBCS's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BUHPF (92). This means that GBCS’s stock grew significantly faster than BUHPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUHPFGBCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GBCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ERLFF1.53N/A
+0.17%
Entree Resources Ltd.
DLAKF8.36N/A
N/A
Deutsche Lufthansa AG
APMSF30.50N/A
N/A
Aperam S.A.
CWID1.10N/A
N/A
Country-Wide Insurance Co.
SNANF0.36-0.02
-4.05%
Sona Nanotech Inc

BUHPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BUHPF and DCGO have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BUHPF and DCGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUHPF
1D Price
Change %
BUHPF100%
N/A
DCGO - BUHPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NUMIF - BUHPF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.10%
GBCS - BUHPF
0%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
PHCI - BUHPF
0%
Poorly correlated
-20.95%
BDULF - BUHPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More