BUKS
Price
$1.51
Change
-$0.08 (-5.03%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
102.08M
CITAF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Updated
May 19 closing price
Capitalization
3.79B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BUKS vs CITAF

Header iconBUKS vs CITAF Comparison
Open Charts BUKS vs CITAFBanner chart's image
Butler National
Price$1.51
Change-$0.08 (-5.03%)
Volume$29.69K
Capitalization102.08M
Cosco Shipping Development
Price$0.11
Change-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Volume$6.7K
Capitalization3.79B
BUKS vs CITAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BUKS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUKS vs. CITAF commentary
May 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUKS is a Hold and CITAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 25, 2025
Stock price -- (BUKS: $1.51 vs. CITAF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: BUKS and CITAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Aerospace & Defense industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUKS: 93% vs. CITAF: 468%
Market capitalization -- BUKS: $102.08M vs. CITAF: $3.79B
BUKS [@Aerospace & Defense] is valued at $102.08M. CITAF’s [@Aerospace & Defense] market capitalization is $3.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry ranges from $248.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry is $18.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUKS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCITAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BUKS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CITAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BUKS is a better buy in the long-term than CITAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUKS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BUKS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BUKS (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а +9.42% price change this week, while CITAF (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was -4.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUKS is expected to report earnings on Mar 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Aerospace & Defense (+3.11% weekly)

Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CITAF($3.79B) has a higher market cap than BUKS($102M). BUKS has higher P/E ratio than CITAF: BUKS (7.19) vs CITAF (6.35). CITAF YTD gains are higher at: -13.525 vs. BUKS (-18.378). CITAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.83B vs. BUKS (27.1M). CITAF has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. BUKS (30.7M). BUKS has less debt than CITAF: BUKS (40.5M) vs CITAF (92.2B). CITAF has higher revenues than BUKS: CITAF (28.1B) vs BUKS (85M).
BUKSCITAFBUKS / CITAF
Capitalization102M3.79B3%
EBITDA27.1M5.83B0%
Gain YTD-18.378-13.525136%
P/E Ratio7.196.35113%
Revenue85M28.1B0%
Total Cash30.7M11.1B0%
Total Debt40.5M92.2B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUKS vs CITAF: Fundamental Ratings
BUKS
CITAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
1
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2092
SMR RATING
1..100
4081
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4776
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6877
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a19

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CITAF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BUKS (49). This means that CITAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BUKS’s over the last 12 months.

BUKS's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CITAF (92). This means that BUKS’s stock grew significantly faster than CITAF’s over the last 12 months.

BUKS's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CITAF (81). This means that BUKS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CITAF’s over the last 12 months.

BUKS's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CITAF (76). This means that BUKS’s stock grew similarly to CITAF’s over the last 12 months.

BUKS's P/E Growth Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as CITAF (77). This means that BUKS’s stock grew similarly to CITAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUKS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BUKS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HUMA2.530.13
+5.42%
Humacyte
OPXS8.290.37
+4.67%
Optex Systems Holdings
SGHC8.410.04
+0.48%
Super Group (SGHC) Limited
ADP321.09-1.54
-0.48%
Automatic Data Processing
HRB57.76-0.41
-0.70%
H&R Block

BUKS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BUKS and AUTLF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BUKS and AUTLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUKS
1D Price
Change %
BUKS100%
-5.03%
AUTLF - BUKS
9%
Poorly correlated
-3.85%
CMGMY - BUKS
4%
Poorly correlated
-5.76%
AVNBF - BUKS
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BAESY - BUKS
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
CITAF - BUKS
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CITAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CITAF and CMGMF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CITAF and CMGMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CITAF
1D Price
Change %
CITAF100%
N/A
CMGMF - CITAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUTLF - CITAF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.85%
BUKS - CITAF
3%
Poorly correlated
-5.03%
CMGMY - CITAF
1%
Poorly correlated
-5.76%
BDRAF - CITAF
1%
Poorly correlated
+10.03%
More