Ad is loading...
BUL vs SCHM
BUL vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts BUL vs SCHM
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF
Price$46.03
Change-$0.35 (-0.75%)
Volume$3.5K
Net Assets73.63M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$26.43
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
Volume$808.55K
Net Assets10.97B
BUL vs SCHM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUL vs. SCHM commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUL is a Buy and SCHM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 11B vs. BUL (73.6M). BUL has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHM: BUL (-0.671) vs SCHM (-4.346). BUL was incepted earlier than SCHM: BUL (6 years) vs SCHM (14 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than BUL (0.60). BUL has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| BUL | SCHM | BUL / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | -0.671 | -4.346 | 15% |
| Net Assets | 73.6M | 11B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.04 | 1,500% |
| Turnover | 123.00 | 13.00 | 946% |
| Yield | 0.21 | 1.52 | 14% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUL | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUL has been closely correlated with NVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUL jumps, then NVT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
More | ||||