Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUL vs SCHM
BUL vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts BUL vs SCHM
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF
Price$50.10
Change+$0.28 (+0.56%)
Volume$168
Net Assets79.52M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$28.40
Change+$0.18 (+0.64%)
Volume$1.06M
Net Assets11.66B
BUL vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUL vs. SCHM commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUL is a Buy and SCHM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 11.7B vs. BUL (79.5M). BUL has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHM: BUL (7.540) vs SCHM (3.158). BUL was incepted earlier than SCHM: BUL (6 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than BUL (0.60). BUL has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| BUL | SCHM | BUL / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 7.540 | 3.158 | 239% |
| Net Assets | 79.5M | 11.7B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.04 | 1,500% |
| Turnover | 137.00 | 13.00 | 1,054% |
| Yield | 0.14 | 1.44 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUL | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 84% | 8 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.64% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.48% | ||
More | ||||