Ad is loading...
BUL vs SCHM
BUL vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts BUL vs SCHM
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF
Price$48.48
Change+$0.21 (+0.44%)
Volume$18.74K
Net Assets75.18M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$28.82
Change+$0.12 (+0.42%)
Volume$1.02M
Net Assets11.72B
BUL vs SCHM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUL vs. SCHM commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUL is a Buy and SCHM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 11.7B vs. BUL (75.2M). BUL has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHM: BUL (4.568) vs SCHM (4.006). BUL was incepted earlier than SCHM: BUL (6 years) vs SCHM (14 years). BUL has a higher turnover SCHM (18.00) vs SCHM (18.00).
| BUL | SCHM | BUL / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 4.568 | 4.006 | 114% |
| Net Assets | 75.2M | 11.7B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 182.00 | 18.00 | 1,011% |
| Yield | 1.48 | 1.42 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUL | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 86% | 12 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 74% | 12 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 86% | 14 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 75% | 21 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUL has been loosely correlated with ESAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUL jumps, then ESAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUL | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| ESAB - BUL | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| VNT - BUL | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| WFRD - BUL | 50% Loosely correlated | +5.34% | ||
| OVV - BUL | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| RVTY - BUL | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
More | ||||
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.42% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
More | ||||