BULT
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
SFSVF
Price
$89.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 8 closing price
Ad is loading...

BULT vs SFSVF

Header iconBULT vs SFSVF Comparison
Open Charts BULT vs SFSVFBanner chart's image
BULLET BLOCKCHAIN
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
Software Service
Price$89.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BULT vs SFSVF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
BULT vs. SFSVF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BULT is a Hold and SFSVF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BULT: $0.05 vs. SFSVF: $89.00)
Brand notoriety: BULT and SFSVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BULT: 5% vs. SFSVF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BULT: $571.26K vs. SFSVF: $380.86M
BULT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $571.26K. SFSVF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $380.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BULT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFSVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BULT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFSVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFSVF is a better buy in the long-term than BULT.

Price Growth

BULT (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SFSVF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.14% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFSVF($381M) has a higher market cap than BULT($571K). SFSVF YTD gains are higher at: 38.070 vs. BULT (-43.750).
BULTSFSVFBULT / SFSVF
Capitalization571K381M0%
EBITDAN/A6.28B-
Gain YTD-43.75038.070-115%
P/E RatioN/A12.63-
RevenueN/A31.1B-
Total CashN/A8.97B-
Total DebtN/A0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BULT: Fundamental Ratings
BULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
14
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
64
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

BULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BULT and SCFR have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BULT and SCFR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BULT
1D Price
Change %
BULT100%
N/A
SCFR - BULT
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIERF - BULT
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SFSVF - BULT
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNELF - BULT
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDCSF - BULT
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SFSVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFSVF has been loosely correlated with CRWRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFSVF jumps, then CRWRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFSVF
1D Price
Change %
SFSVF100%
N/A
CRWRF - SFSVF
58%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SWDAF - SFSVF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TMOAF - SFSVF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
XBP - SFSVF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DDI - SFSVF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
More