Advertisement
BULT vs SFSVF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BULT is a Hold and SFSVF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BULT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFSVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BULT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SFSVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BULT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BULT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
BULT (@Computer Communications) experienced а -2.75% price change this week, while SFSVF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.51%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.19%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+2.22% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Services to the Health Industry (+1.22% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
| BULT | SFSVF | BULT / SFSVF | |
| Capitalization | 24.6M | 485M | 5% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 7.3B | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.627 | -13.910 | -163% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 12.30 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 36.6B | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 21.3B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
BULT | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BULT | SFSVF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 4% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 5% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 89% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
BULT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BULT and SCFR have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BULT and SCFR's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BULT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BULT | 100% | +0.81% | ||
| SCFR - BULT | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SFSVF - BULT | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TDCSF - BULT | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NDATF - BULT | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BSQKZ - BULT | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SFSVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFSVF has been loosely correlated with CRWRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFSVF jumps, then CRWRF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SFSVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SFSVF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CRWRF - SFSVF | 58% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| TMOAF - SFSVF | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| XBP - SFSVF | 27% Poorly correlated | +12.47% | ||
| OVTZ - SFSVF | 26% Poorly correlated | -4.91% | ||
| DDI - SFSVF | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.07% | ||
More | ||||