BULT
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
571.26K
TDCSF
Price
$9.00
Change
+$1.08 (+13.64%)
Updated
Feb 10 closing price
Capitalization
329.32M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BULT vs TDCSF

Header iconBULT vs TDCSF Comparison
Open Charts BULT vs TDCSFBanner chart's image
BULLET BLOCKCHAIN
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$123.08K
Capitalization571.26K
Tdc Software Engineering
Price$9.00
Change+$1.08 (+13.64%)
Volume$629
Capitalization329.32M
BULT vs TDCSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BULT vs. TDCSF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BULT is a Buy and TDCSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BULT: $0.08 vs. TDCSF: $9.00)
Brand notoriety: BULT and TDCSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BULT: 418% vs. TDCSF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BULT: $571.26K vs. TDCSF: $329.32M
BULT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $571.26K. TDCSF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $329.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BULT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTDCSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BULT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TDCSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TDCSF is a better buy in the long-term than BULT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BULT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BULT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BULT (@Packaged Software) experienced а +127.27% price change this week, while TDCSF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.43%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.19% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TDCSF($329M) has a higher market cap than BULT($571K). BULT YTD gains are higher at: 58.228 vs. TDCSF (13.636).
BULTTDCSFBULT / TDCSF
Capitalization571K329M0%
EBITDAN/A3.54B-
Gain YTD58.22813.636427%
P/E RatioN/A15.70-
RevenueN/A34.2B-
Total CashN/A11.7B-
Total DebtN/A900M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BULT: Fundamental Ratings
BULT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
21
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BULTTDCSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BULT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JWEL2.700.10
+3.85%
Jowell Global Ltd
CEVA22.900.63
+2.83%
CEVA
GEN30.490.68
+2.28%
Gen Digital
INTR7.050.12
+1.73%
Inter & Co
FEIM21.410.28
+1.35%
Frequency Electronics

BULT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BULT and SCFR have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BULT and SCFR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BULT
1D Price
Change %
BULT100%
N/A
SCFR - BULT
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.25%
SFSVF - BULT
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDCSF - BULT
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NDATF - BULT
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSQKZ - BULT
6%
Poorly correlated
+10.00%
More

TDCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TDCSF has been closely correlated with JAPPF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TDCSF jumps, then JAPPF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TDCSF
1D Price
Change %
TDCSF100%
N/A
JAPPF - TDCSF
78%
Closely correlated
N/A
IDGAF - TDCSF
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IPNAF - TDCSF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PSHPF - TDCSF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPNUF - TDCSF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More