BULZ
Price
$42.55
Change
-$1.38 (-3.14%)
Updated
Oct 12 closing price
Net Assets
3.68B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TQQQ
Price
$79.61
Change
-$1.67 (-2.05%)
Updated
Oct 12 closing price
Net Assets
38.81B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BULZ vs TQQQ

BULZ vs TQQQ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 29, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) vs. ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ)

Key Takeaways

  • BULZ delivers 3x daily exposure to a concentrated index of FANG and innovation stocks, while TQQQ provides 3x daily exposure to the broader Nasdaq-100 Index.
  • Both ETFs employ daily-reset leveraged structures, amplifying short-term moves but introducing significant volatility and compounding effects over longer periods.
  • BULZ features fewer holdings focused on large-cap technology names, whereas TQQQ tracks approximately 100 companies across technology, consumer, and other growth sectors.
  • Expense ratios for both products stand at approximately 0.95%, reflecting the costs associated with leveraged strategies.
  • BULZ emphasizes thematic concentration in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and digital innovation leaders; TQQQ offers diversified exposure within the technology-heavy Nasdaq-100.
  • Structural differences in underlying indices drive distinct risk-return profiles, with BULZ exhibiting higher concentration risk and TQQQ providing broader sector representation.

Introduction

Investors seeking amplified exposure to technology and growth equities often evaluate leveraged exchange-traded products targeting similar themes. BULZ and TQQQ both utilize 3x daily leverage but pursue different underlying benchmarks, positioning them as complementary rather than direct competitors. BULZ focuses on a select group of FANG and innovation companies, while TQQQ tracks the broader Nasdaq-100. This comparison highlights how their structural and exposure differences influence suitability across market environments.

MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) Overview

BULZ is an exchange-traded note (ETN) issued by Bank of Montreal that seeks three times (3x) the daily performance of the Solactive FANG Innovation Index before fees. The index includes eight core components—Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Netflix, NVIDIA, and Tesla—plus additional innovation-focused technology companies, resulting in a concentrated portfolio of 15 holdings. The strategy is passive and equal-weighted, with daily rebalancing to maintain leverage. The expense ratio is 0.95%. As an ETN, BULZ carries issuer credit risk in addition to market and leverage risks. Liquidity is supported by active trading on NYSE American.

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) Overview

TQQQ is an exchange-traded fund (ETF) from ProShares that seeks three times (3x) the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index before fees and expenses. The underlying index comprises 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on Nasdaq, spanning technology, consumer discretionary, communication services, and other growth sectors. TQQQ holds a diversified basket of approximately 100 securities with daily rebalancing to reset leverage. The expense ratio is 0.95%. As a traditional ETF, it avoids ETN-specific credit risk. Shares trade on Nasdaq with substantial liquidity.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to benefit from advancements in artificial intelligence, cloud infrastructure, and digital transformation. Capital flows into growth equities remain influenced by interest rate expectations, corporate earnings from major technology firms, and regulatory developments around data privacy and competition. Macroeconomic factors such as inflation trends and monetary policy shifts affect investor appetite for leveraged products. Sector risks include valuation compression during periods of rising rates and potential slowdowns in technology spending cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited high volatility consistent with their 3x daily leverage mandates. BULZ’s concentrated exposure to FANG and innovation names has produced sharper moves during periods of strong performance in artificial intelligence and semiconductor leaders. TQQQ’s broader Nasdaq-100 allocation has delivered more balanced participation across technology subsectors. Relative positioning favors TQQQ for investors seeking diversified growth exposure, while BULZ appeals to those targeting concentrated thematic bets. Compounding effects from daily resets remain a key consideration in extended holding periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including diversification profile, cost efficiency, and sector momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable positioning to TQQQ. Its broader exposure to the Nasdaq-100 reduces single-name concentration risk relative to BULZ while maintaining comparable leverage characteristics and expense structure.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BULZ vs. TQQQ commentary
Oct 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BULZ is a Hold and TQQQ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BULZTQQQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
BULZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TQQQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XLCI23.550.21
+0.91%
State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI)
BILT26.760.18
+0.68%
iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT)
SMB16.980.01
+0.03%
VanEck Short Muni ETF (SMB)
IBDX24.08-0.01
-0.06%
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corporate ETF (IBDX)
PLTG24.46-0.03
-0.12%
Leverage Shares 2X Long PLTR Daily ETF (PLTG)

BULZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BULZ has been closely correlated with ADBE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BULZ jumps, then ADBE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BULZ
1D Price
Change %
BULZ100%
-3.14%
ADBE - BULZ
80%
Closely correlated
-1.70%
ORCL - BULZ
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.84%
META - BULZ
43%
Loosely correlated
+3.38%
MSFT - BULZ
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
CRM - BULZ
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
More