BUSE
Price
$24.13
Change
+$0.07 (+0.29%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
36 days until earnings call
CARE
Price
$17.59
Change
-$0.09 (-0.51%)
Updated
Dec 23, 11:17 AM (EDT)
31 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BUSE vs CARE

Header iconBUSE vs CARE Comparison
Open Charts BUSE vs CAREBanner chart's image
First Busey
Price$24.13
Change+$0.07 (+0.29%)
Volume$9.71K
CapitalizationN/A
Carter Bankshares
Price$17.59
Change-$0.09 (-0.51%)
Volume$268
CapitalizationN/A
BUSE vs CARE Comparison Chart
Loading...
BUSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CARE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUSE vs. CARE commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUSE is a Hold and CARE is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (BUSE: $24.14 vs. CARE: $17.68)
Brand notoriety: BUSE and CARE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUSE: 234% vs. CARE: 200%
Market capitalization -- BUSE: $1.33B vs. CARE: $285.02M
BUSE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.33B. CARE’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $285.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUSE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCARE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BUSE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CARE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BUSE and CARE are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUSE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CARE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUSE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CARE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BUSE is a better buy in the short-term than CARE.

Price Growth

BUSE (@Regional Banks) experienced а -7.97% price change this week, while CARE (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUSE is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.

CARE is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUSE($1.33B) has a higher market cap than CARE($285M). CARE has higher P/E ratio than BUSE: CARE (12.38) vs BUSE (10.79). CARE YTD gains are higher at: 18.103 vs. BUSE (1.175). BUSE has less debt than CARE: BUSE (336M) vs CARE (393M). BUSE has higher revenues than CARE: BUSE (442M) vs CARE (137M).
BUSECAREBUSE / CARE
Capitalization1.33B285M466%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.17518.1036%
P/E Ratio10.7912.3887%
Revenue442M137M323%
Total Cash142MN/A-
Total Debt336M393M85%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUSE vs CARE: Fundamental Ratings
BUSE
CARE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
75100
SMR RATING
1..100
1536
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
327
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BUSE's Valuation (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CARE (60). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to CARE’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CARE (100). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to CARE’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CARE (36). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to CARE’s over the last 12 months.

CARE's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (59). This means that CARE’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

CARE's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (32). This means that CARE’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUSECARE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BUSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CARE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ISVGX22.930.27
+1.19%
Voya Growth and Income Port S
WPSGX53.680.55
+1.04%
AB Concentrated Growth Advisor
APPIX14.100.14
+1.00%
Appleseed Institutional
FSBCX19.620.11
+0.56%
Federated Hermes Global Allocation C
MGRQX36.890.03
+0.08%
MFS International Growth R2

BUSE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUSE has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUSE jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUSE
1D Price
Change %
BUSE100%
+0.33%
FFBC - BUSE
91%
Closely correlated
+1.83%
UBSI - BUSE
90%
Closely correlated
+1.36%
NWBI - BUSE
90%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
THFF - BUSE
90%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
WSBC - BUSE
89%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
More