BUSE
Price
$24.74
Change
+$0.24 (+0.98%)
Updated
Sep 18, 12:14 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.17B
40 days until earnings call
EFSC
Price
$60.33
Change
+$0.86 (+1.45%)
Updated
Sep 18, 12:22 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.2B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BUSE vs EFSC

Header iconBUSE vs EFSC Comparison
Open Charts BUSE vs EFSCBanner chart's image
First Busey
Price$24.74
Change+$0.24 (+0.98%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.17B
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$60.33
Change+$0.86 (+1.45%)
Volume$300
Capitalization2.2B
BUSE vs EFSC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BUSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUSE vs. EFSC commentary
Sep 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUSE is a Buy and EFSC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BUSE: $24.51 vs. EFSC: $59.47)
Brand notoriety: BUSE and EFSC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUSE: 104% vs. EFSC: 108%
Market capitalization -- BUSE: $2.17B vs. EFSC: $2.2B
BUSE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.17B. EFSC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $168.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUSE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEFSC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BUSE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • EFSC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the long-term than BUSE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUSE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EFSC’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUSE’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • EFSC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the short-term than BUSE.

Price Growth

BUSE (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.53% price change this week, while EFSC (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUSE is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.27% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFSC($2.2B) and BUSE($2.17B) have the same market capitalization . BUSE has higher P/E ratio than EFSC: BUSE (19.45) vs EFSC (11.31). BUSE YTD gains are higher at: 7.558 vs. EFSC (7.167). EFSC has more cash in the bank: 253M vs. BUSE (191M). BUSE has less debt than EFSC: BUSE (306M) vs EFSC (661M). BUSE (557M) and EFSC (552M) have equivalent revenues.
BUSEEFSCBUSE / EFSC
Capitalization2.17B2.2B99%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.5587.167105%
P/E Ratio19.4511.31172%
Revenue557M552M101%
Total Cash191M253M75%
Total Debt306M661M46%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUSE vs EFSC: Fundamental Ratings
BUSE
EFSC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6959
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4430
SMR RATING
1..100
1915
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5149
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1749
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3350

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EFSC's Valuation (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (63). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (44). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (19). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (51). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (49). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUSEEFSC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BUSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IJPTX12.17N/A
N/A
VY® JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity S2
PYEQX26.17N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Equity Income Y
HDPBX27.86N/A
N/A
Hodges Blue Chip Equity Income Retail
PRDAX12.23N/A
N/A
Principal Diversified Real Asset A
TRUZX57.87-0.05
-0.09%
T. Rowe Price New Horizons Z

BUSE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUSE has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUSE jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUSE
1D Price
Change %
BUSE100%
+0.74%
FFBC - BUSE
89%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
EFSC - BUSE
89%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
WSFS - BUSE
88%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
UBSI - BUSE
88%
Closely correlated
+0.91%
FBK - BUSE
88%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
More

EFSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with WSFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then WSFS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSC
1D Price
Change %
EFSC100%
+0.10%
WSFS - EFSC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
GABC - EFSC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
SBCF - EFSC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
STBA - EFSC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
FNB - EFSC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
More