BUSE
Price
$20.23
Change
-$1.48 (-6.81%)
Updated
Apr 3, 02:31 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.33B
26 days until earnings call
EFSC
Price
$50.32
Change
-$3.98 (-7.33%)
Updated
Apr 3, 02:36 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.47B
25 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BUSE vs EFSC

Header iconBUSE vs EFSC Comparison
Open Charts BUSE vs EFSCBanner chart's image
First Busey
Price$20.23
Change-$1.48 (-6.81%)
Volume$400
Capitalization1.33B
Enterprise Financial Services
Price$50.32
Change-$3.98 (-7.33%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.47B
BUSE vs EFSC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BUSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUSE vs. EFSC commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUSE is a StrongBuy and EFSC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (BUSE: $21.72 vs. EFSC: $54.30)
Brand notoriety: BUSE and EFSC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUSE: 75% vs. EFSC: 71%
Market capitalization -- BUSE: $1.33B vs. EFSC: $1.47B
BUSE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.33B. EFSC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUSE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEFSC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BUSE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EFSC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, EFSC is a better buy in the long-term than BUSE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUSE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EFSC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUSE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • EFSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BUSE is a better buy in the short-term than EFSC.

Price Growth

BUSE (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.99% price change this week, while EFSC (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUSE is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

EFSC is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.02% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EFSC($1.47B) has a higher market cap than BUSE($1.33B). BUSE has higher P/E ratio than EFSC: BUSE (10.79) vs EFSC (7.73). EFSC YTD gains are higher at: -3.209 vs. BUSE (-6.841). EFSC has more cash in the bank: 193M vs. BUSE (142M). EFSC has less debt than BUSE: EFSC (204M) vs BUSE (336M). EFSC has higher revenues than BUSE: EFSC (550M) vs BUSE (442M).
BUSEEFSCBUSE / EFSC
Capitalization1.33B1.47B90%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.841-3.209213%
P/E Ratio10.797.73140%
Revenue442M550M80%
Total Cash142M193M74%
Total Debt336M204M165%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUSE vs EFSC: Fundamental Ratings
BUSE
EFSC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6451
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4828
SMR RATING
1..100
1612
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7451
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4514
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BUSE's Valuation (71) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EFSC (73). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to EFSC’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (48). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (16). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (74). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

EFSC's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (45). This means that EFSC’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUSEEFSC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BUSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EFSC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDDVX19.810.11
+0.56%
BlackRock Equity Dividend Inv A
BIDVX14.520.06
+0.41%
BlackRock GA Disciplined Vol Eq Instl
GAGAX31.57N/A
N/A
Gabelli Global Rising Income and Div A
DDZRX13.53N/A
N/A
Macquarie Value R6
HSLAX34.32N/A
N/A
Hartford Small Cap Growth A

BUSE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUSE has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUSE jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUSE
1D Price
Change %
BUSE100%
+0.70%
FFBC - BUSE
89%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
NWBI - BUSE
88%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
FMBH - BUSE
87%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
FRME - BUSE
87%
Closely correlated
-0.20%
CTBI - BUSE
87%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
More

EFSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFSC has been closely correlated with NWBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFSC jumps, then NWBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EFSC
1D Price
Change %
EFSC100%
+1.46%
NWBI - EFSC
87%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
CCNE - EFSC
85%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
PRK - EFSC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
FRME - EFSC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.20%
BUSE - EFSC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
More