BUSE
Price
$23.13
Change
+$0.27 (+1.18%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.33B
10 days until earnings call
LKFN
Price
$68.39
Change
+$0.24 (+0.35%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.72B
6 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BUSE vs LKFN

Header iconBUSE vs LKFN Comparison
Open Charts BUSE vs LKFNBanner chart's image
First Busey
Price$23.13
Change+$0.27 (+1.18%)
Volume$462.51K
Capitalization1.33B
Lakeland Financial
Price$68.39
Change+$0.24 (+0.35%)
Volume$494.55K
Capitalization1.72B
BUSE vs LKFN Comparison Chart
Loading...
BUSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LKFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUSE vs. LKFN commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUSE is a Hold and LKFN is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BUSE: $23.13 vs. LKFN: $68.39)
Brand notoriety: BUSE and LKFN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUSE: 143% vs. LKFN: 400%
Market capitalization -- BUSE: $1.33B vs. LKFN: $1.72B
BUSE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.33B. LKFN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUSE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLKFN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BUSE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LKFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BUSE is a better buy in the long-term than LKFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUSE’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LKFN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUSE’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LKFN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LKFN is a better buy in the short-term than BUSE.

Price Growth

BUSE (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.52% price change this week, while LKFN (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUSE is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

LKFN is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LKFN($1.72B) has a higher market cap than BUSE($1.33B). LKFN has higher P/E ratio than BUSE: LKFN (17.66) vs BUSE (10.79). LKFN YTD gains are higher at: -0.538 vs. BUSE (-1.867). BUSE has more cash in the bank: 142M vs. LKFN (75.1M). LKFN has less debt than BUSE: LKFN (50M) vs BUSE (336M). BUSE has higher revenues than LKFN: BUSE (442M) vs LKFN (247M).
BUSELKFNBUSE / LKFN
Capitalization1.33B1.72B77%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.867-0.538347%
P/E Ratio10.7917.6661%
Revenue442M247M179%
Total Cash142M75.1M189%
Total Debt336M50M672%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUSE vs LKFN: Fundamental Ratings
BUSE
LKFN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
811
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8944
SMR RATING
1..100
1518
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6254
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3854
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BUSE's Valuation (43) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LKFN (98). This means that BUSE’s stock grew somewhat faster than LKFN’s over the last 12 months.

LKFN's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BUSE (89). This means that LKFN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LKFN (18). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to LKFN’s over the last 12 months.

LKFN's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (62). This means that LKFN’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LKFN (54). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to LKFN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUSELKFN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BUSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LKFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IRLUX44.100.48
+1.10%
Voya Russell Large Cap Index Port S2
TSTRX19.690.20
+1.03%
Transamerica Stock Index R
SECIX44.920.33
+0.74%
NAA Large Cap Value A
FLPKX41.610.19
+0.46%
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock K
VRSGX33.62N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Growth R6

BUSE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUSE has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUSE jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUSE
1D Price
Change %
BUSE100%
+1.18%
FFBC - BUSE
91%
Closely correlated
+1.45%
NWBI - BUSE
90%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
UBSI - BUSE
90%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
THFF - BUSE
90%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
WSBC - BUSE
89%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
More

LKFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LKFN has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LKFN jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LKFN
1D Price
Change %
LKFN100%
+0.35%
THFF - LKFN
85%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
BUSE - LKFN
85%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
NWBI - LKFN
85%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
SYBT - LKFN
84%
Closely correlated
+1.98%
PFC - LKFN
84%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
More